SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (46869)3/23/1999 2:41:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
9
investment. As well, we'd argue vehemently that
DoubleClick's competitive position (certainly
with the Network business but increasingly with
the DART business) has grown stronger every
day and now that we believe has reached a real
inflection point (of no return?), we'd argue for a
lower discount rate and thus a higher valuation
(all other things being equal). Our target of $200
places a $3.4 billion valuation on DCLK, which
we get to via a revenue multiple (15Xs 2000
compared to the Internet universe mean of 18Xs)
and a discounted earnings approach (125Xs the
NPV of 2002's $2.50 EPS estimate compared to
the Internet universe mean of 165Xs forward
EPS). We admit that this is more art than
science, but on a relative basis, we find
DoubleClick cheap against its opportunity and
competitive position.
Yup…The Price Target Is Aggressive
For fun late last night we went back over a
model of DCLK that we kept from January 1998.
Our thinking at that time was that at the end of
1998 DCLK would report about $50 million in
revenue. Well, history now shows DCLK's 1998
revenue came in at $80 million, 60% higher than
what we (and the company, we may add) thought
was aggressive then. Now we're not saying that
our 2000 revenue estimate will prove to be
equally conservative, but our gut tells us that the
revenue and earnings upside remains too big to
quantify with any precision, and our recall from
the cold days of early 1998 adds weight to that
feeling. We'd also add that our bets in the
Internet space over the last few years have
tended to coalesce around those established
leaders whose markets were big, whose
management teams were aggressive and smart,
and whose business model made the most sense.
On all three counts, DoubleClick is exceeding
our early optimistic expectations.
What?! Upgrade Into A $40 Move In The Last 6
Trading Days?
We know we're taking a risk upgrading at this
particular moment, since any number of
hobgoblins could cause a nice retraction in this
stock sooner rather than later: quiet period
skittishness, unusual arbitrage-inspired trading
(from the recent $200 million convert offering),
profit taking (DCLK was at $87 March 1 st ), or
simply that the March quarter results won't meet
“whisper” number expectations (and who can
tell what those are?). But you pay us to take risks
and, besides, we hesitated to upgrade DCLK
when the Alta-Vista overhang was resolved in
January, and we've paid for it. As we said on
January 21st:
“Our maintenance of the Buy rating
reflects our strategy to keep our powder
dry on this one until we get just a bit
more data on those drivers of the model
in 1999: Compaq's investment in Alta-Vista,
the success of the Closed Loop
product, the continued ascendancy of
DART, and the critical mass point in
their International business. We suspect
all of these factors will tip their hand
one way or another in 1999 (our early
bet is that the tip will be positive) so
until then, we stick with the Buy rating.”
We don't want to learn this hesitation lesson
twice, so we won't get cute by trying to time a
trading call today (though we sure wish the stock
wasn't up $15 yesterday). We're upgrading
based on a more fundamental business
momentum call, so if (when?) the stock comes
back after such an aggressive move, we'd be all
over it attempting to round out a position in one
of the best plays on Internet advertising out
there.
Why We're Making DoubleClick A Core Internet
Holding
We chewed on this upgrade for some time, not
because we thought DCLK wouldn't do well as a
stock, but rather because of the austere company
DCLK now finds themselves in within our