Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (53180)	3/23/1999 5:48:00 PM
From: J. P.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

<<Put premiums are not expanding the way they should given how right my put picks have been.>> Ha! I rode the MUPJ's 30 points down and only made $350 bucks per contract profit!

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (53180)	3/23/1999 5:57:00 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

>>Put premiums are not expanding the way they should given how right my put picks have been.<< Theory on that?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (53180)	3/23/1999 6:07:00 PM
From: Lucretius	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

MB: I'd say the fact that your prem's haven't moved up (I've noticed the same thing) are actually quite bearish.. stocks are falling out of the sky and nobody is scared.... that means they're gonna get REAL scared later.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (53180)	3/23/1999 6:16:00 PM
From: wlheatmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

just two symbols to scare the bejeesus out of you----- SCH PVN ho ho ho

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (53180)	3/23/1999 8:03:00 PM
From: Eggolas Moria	Respond to of 132070

CPQ needs to hire Laverne and Shirley apparently.