Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (4055)	3/23/1999 6:22:00 PM
From: Justa Werkenstiff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15132

MUST SEE - RUSSELL 2000 GRAPH I am no technical guru, but geez this looks like a head and shoulders top in the making. Tread cautiously here: decisionpoint.com

To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (4055)	3/24/1999 1:56:00 PM
From: Wally Mastroly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15132

Re: Small Caps - MotleyFoolish opinion: perhaps understated: fnews.yahoo.com An excerpt: FOOL ON THE HILL An Investment Opinion by Warren Gump Casey's General Story "..The disfavor of small stocks is well known to most readers. Over the past three years, the Russell 2000 index, a measure of small capitalization stocks, has returned 7.8% annually compared to the whopping 28.8% return provided by the S&P 500 index of large cap stocks. Many people have hypothesized why these returns have been so divergent, such as the higher returns on capital and the dramatic earnings growth offered by some of the big technology companies in the S&P. While some of the reasoning offered is valid, I believe the primary reason for the significant outperformance of the S&P 500 is a shift in investor sentiment toward large cap issues..."