To: Bill Murphy who wrote (4752 ) 3/24/1999 9:04:00 AM From: IngotWeTrust Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81084
Well, well, well, Bill. Sorehead are we? I just tried my free complimentary le cafe LOGIN for the first time in about 4 weeks. A permanent complimentary membership which you begged me to accept back when you were a nobody. Guess who has cut off my access. More to Hide, Bill? YOU Can't answer ANYONE's questions, just ask them for money, YOU Can't handle ANYONE's opposing opinions even when they are correct & you were WRONG YOU Can't apologize publically for rude and ungentlemanly public behavior YOU Can't keep honor your complimentary memberships It is now Wednesday, March 24, 9AM EST You were originally publically asked on Thursday March 18, 1:47 EST the 6 organizational Q's posed thru me by serious funding sources. It has now been 6 Days with out answers for them. They are repeated below 4 Ur convenience in individually answering: The mirror Questions are: (again for the 5th MIRROR time:) 1) Since GATA is a For Profit Corporation, there are you and 2 others as officers. Is this correct? Answered 3/18/99: GATA is a "Not-For-Profit" organization. Answered 3/19/99: In reply to Darleen (see above) this appears to not be the correct answer, so this is still unanswered by a yes or a no. Writes: Pete S 3/20/99: "GATA is a 'not for profit' but I don't know any details." 2) What is the retainer fee being requested by the law firm you, as GATA are pretty set upon using? 3) Since you are exploring an anti-trust action --and have noted many times on this thread how much cash settlement M&B won on their most visible previous action-- is or is not this case being taken on a contingency fee/split agreement? 4) If yes it is a contingency fee case, then why is there a retainer fee requested in advance? 5) Assuming success in your actions, what is the current GATA plan for splitting of their portion of the judgement award? 6) Since this is a private, for profit corporation, how do contributors secure timely, audited financial statements? Partial Answer/extrapolation: this is now declared to be a "Not for Profit" as of 3/18/99. ººº As such, there are legit avenues, governed by the state of Delaware, and the particular IRS organizational code, for GATA contributors or any interested party who wishes a look into the books on a timely manner a means to do so. ººº Readers: Please refer to retraction/modification under point one. Delaware filing structure is back in the non-disclosed category, and remains to be answered.