To: findstock who wrote (21712 ) 3/24/1999 3:25:00 PM From: Martin E. Frankel Respond to of 44908
Hi Findstock, << I will be a bit more excited about a new PR firm and the fact we start getting a broader group interested in TSIG >> I am excited about the new website because it means a number of things to me: (1) TSIG now has a professional top caliber internet division capable of putting together a mechanically difficult site in a relatively short time. It also shows me that the additional new sites that will be required by TSIG will be up faster and be of top quality. (2) It will be much easier to close deals and make new alliances with this website. I know that a number of "deals" have been held-up intentionally until the new site was ready. I do, however, agree with you about the importance of a new PR firm and getting a broader group interested (or should I say "aware") of TSIG. Other than the few members of the threads and lurkers on SI and RagingBull... how many people have even heard of TSIG... yet? And how many are day-traders or momentum players? IMO, it won't be long (and that is a relative term) before TSIG becomes a "household" name, but investors have to first know the company exists. It would be stupid for me to say I expect the stock to be $50/share next week or next month, but my investment, as I have said many times, is for many, many years. Dump it out now, especially when things are so obviously starting to move forward, would be, IMO, like dumping the baby out with the bath water. I've used fundamental and technical analysis for years and, for me at least, I have made my decision regarding my investment in TSIG. I'm willing to watch the magic happen... and, IMO, it will expotentially... and collect the big dollars in the end rather than scrounge for pennies. I didn't even have a chance to look at the stock price until just now. I'm not selling... so why worry? And this too shall pass. Be Right!!!... Sit Tight!!! Best always, Marty P.S.: Findstock, this was not directed at you or anyone in particular, but was only my comment on your post.