Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ruthie who wrote (18164)	3/25/1999 7:37:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Respond to of 20681

Ruthie, In your opinion, what do you think is the motivation for the dissisdents trying to undercut Bob? In other words, what do you think they have to gain by doing this? Mark

To: Ruthie who wrote (18164)	3/25/1999 7:46:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Ruthie, sorry, but I don't know the answers to your questions. We would have to read the companies rules of incorporation or equivalent documentation. Your concern on the proxy issue may be valid if a court rules the dissident meeting legal. <<I have spoken with Bob many times>> He should be your best source to answer all your questions. Let us know what he says. PS, IMO while the uncertainty does unsettle and hurt stock price in the near term, there is occurring a struggle that says there is something worth protection. Both the objective of stock appreciation by any reason and the other camp's objective to create a mine should help increase shareholder value if the method doesn't include mutual assured destruction. This nonsense kind of reminds me of the Les Miserables, Dog Eats Dog.