Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Murphy who wrote (4795)	3/25/1999 12:04:00 PM
From: IngotWeTrust	Respond to of 81972

Just answer t'Qs, Bill. No harrassing when asking Qs U refuse 2 answer. Here they are again, for the 6th time...hell, print'em out good buddy and show 'em to your new "aggressive lawyers"...that is if you've got t'ball(s?) The mirror Questions are: (again for the 6th MIRROR time:) 1) Since GATA is a For Profit Corporation, there are you and 2 others as officers. Is this correct? Answered 3/18/99: GATA is a "Not-For-Profit" organization. Answered 3/19/99: In reply to Darleen (see above) this appears to not be the correct answer, so this is still unanswered by a yes or a no. Writes: Pete S 3/20/99: "GATA is a 'not for profit' but I don't know any details." 2) What is the retainer fee being requested by the law firm you, as GATA are pretty set upon using? 3) Since you are exploring an anti-trust action --and have noted many times on this thread how much cash settlement M&B won on their most visible previous action-- is or is not this case being taken on a contingency fee/split agreement? 4) If yes it is a contingency fee case, then why is there a retainer fee requested in advance? 5) Assuming success in your actions, what is the current GATA plan for splitting of their portion of the judgement award? 6) Since this is a private, for profit corporation, how do contributors secure timely, audited financial statements? Partial Answer/extrapolation: this is now declared to be a "Not for Profit" as of 3/18/99. ººº As such, there are legit avenues, governed by the state of Delaware, and the particular IRS organizational code, for GATA contributors or any interested party who wishes a look into the books on a timely manner a means to do so. ººº Readers: Please refer to retraction/modification under point one. Delaware filing structure is back in the non-disclosed category, and remains to be answered

To: Bill Murphy who wrote (4795)	3/26/1999 9:07:00 AM
From: Crimson Ghost	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81972

Gold getting pounded again on war news that would have sent it soaring in the past. This kind of action has become as predictable as the sun rising in the morning. Soaring oil prices have done nothing to help the sickly yellow either. Looks like even my hopes for a modest rally were way too optimistic. Black gold is the place to be. The yellow stuff remains an absolute disaster. This probably will continue until the looming stock bear has radically changed investor psychology.