To: jbIII who wrote (2 ) 3/30/1999 1:50:00 AM From: EL KABONG!!! Respond to of 752
jbIII, Just found TLC's thread, so I'm just catching up now. If this has been answered before, I apologize now. But I just love expressing my opinions. <g>What value is there, if any, in "Calling the Company"? This is one of my favorite questions. I get asked this one a lot by investment club members. In my opinion, there is no reason to call the company anymore. In the old days (before the internet), you might have to call investor relations to get an investor's packet sent to you. This usually consisted of the prior year's annual statement, the current year's 10Qs and some recent press releases. Some companies would even include some statements by analysts that covered their stock. But today, all of that information (and much more) is available on the internet, and most of it is free. Of course, we're talking here about reporting companies on one of the major exchanges like NYSE, NASDAQ or AMEX. We're definitely not talking about the OTC-BB or the pink slips. If you look around SI for awhile, you'll find that many of the big companies that slipped up were first found out by internet posters, not auditors or accountants or analysts or the major news media. The most recent example of this that comes to mind is Micron Technology (?), where SI posters uncovered the inconsistencies between press releases and the company's annual report. Calling a company on the OTC-BB or the pink sheets is a total waste of time. All of these companies have two stories to be heard. The first tale is the one the company tells. It is usually rah-rah type stuff, glowing reports, glowing prospects, glowing promises, success by associating their name with a big company that never heard of them (leeching), and so on. The other story is the one you have to find for yourself. It may involve digging into the past history of company officers and directors, sometimes a very sordid affair. It may involve some forensic accounting. It will be hard work. When you call the BB company you're going to hear the story the company wants you to hear. Almost always, that information is available elsewhere, in press releases or on the threads. A company insider isn't going to give you the inside scoop that hasn't already been carefully considered. If an IR/PR guy or an insider does give you what seems to be relevant information, ask yourself why this isn't public information already. Do you really think that they would give you inside information, even in error? If you post it, and it later turns out to be wrong, the company will merely claim it misunderstood you or you misunderstood their answers. Telephone calls are neither reliable or verifiable. And that word is the key. Verifiable... All information from a BB company should be independently verifiable or you should disregard it, no matter how favorable to the company's story. The real story with BB companies is to check, double-check and independently verify everything they say. Everything. Watch the wording in press releases. Almost always, the wording is deliberately vague and misleading, giving the casual reader the impression of great things to come, but in reality, the company has actually cloaked the promises in vague semantics. Currently, BB companies are either non-reporting, reporting but unaudited, or reporting and audited. Watch the auditor and make sure it's a reputable firm, not the CEO's brother-in-law. Remember, you cannot possibly independently verify anything in a telephone call to the company. KJC