SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (4100)3/28/1999 12:51:00 PM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
Wally,

Thanks for linking the article. Very interesting.



To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (4100)3/28/1999 1:03:00 PM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
*** FT Article ***

INVESTMENT: Benchmarking curse
3/28/99

Warren Buffett, Omaha's (possibly the world's) greatest investor, confesses his ignorance of technology - which appears to extend to current techniques of investment. His annual statement in the Berkshire Hathaway report does not mention the paraphernalia of load differences, active risk and benchmarks that burden more conventional professional investors. He acknowledges, though, that his main job (and that of his partner, Charlie Munger) is allocating capital. He admits they underperformed the S&P 500 Index last year on an underlying basis - without spelling out by how much.

Buffett is, of course, a long-term investor. He proposes to continue indefinitely even after his ashes are confined within an urn placed in his office. The typical money manager, however, cannot hope for immortality or even longevity.

Benchmarking is a curse of the age. The UK faces imminent upheavals here; a new sector classification system takes effect next week with the objective of global harmonisation. Another shift could come in September with the launch of the global multinationals index, which could subsume 40 per cent of the All-Share Index capitalisation.

The UK stock market is curiously skewed. Four sectors - banks, telecommunications services, pharmaceuticals and oil and gas - account for 46 per cent of the All-Share and 56 per cent of the FTSE 100 (though, strangely, only 4 per cent of the FTSE 250).

However, fashionable information technology represents less than 2 per cent of the All-Share. As for more traditional sectors, four great global industries - chemicals, steel, mining and automobiles - account for just 3.2 per cent in aggregate.

Much analysis of stocks and sectors is focused not on the value (or lack of it) they offer but on who "underowns" or "overowns" them relative to market weightings. Index-tracking funds are deliberately indiscriminate buyers and can easily be manoeuvred into being aggressive bidders for stocks with an inadequate free float.

Benchmarked active managers are almost as vulnerable. The neutral position for a manager who does not have a view on a stock is not to ignore it but to own a full weighting. Warren Buffett does not invest like this, nor does George Soros for that matter. But in the benchmarked world, risk is shifted from managers to clients.

Without a value peg, share prices can become extremely volatile, as in the second half of 1998. It is risky to own shares; from a manager's point of view, however, it is risky not to.

Active managers often still take aggressive positions, though. According to Dresdner Kleinwort Benson, UK pension funds are heavily overweight in Allied Domecq, United Biscuits and British Land but underweight in Halifax. They have zero exposure to Eurotunnel. US institutions active in the UK market are very exposed to consumer cyclicals and to chemicals and steel.

Are these positions risky? Hardly more so, perhaps, than "neutral" exposures. Dramatic shifts can take place when technical shortages are unexpectedly satisfied, as with the massive sales of big stakes in UK telecom stocks in recent weeks. The telecoms sector index has just tumbled by 11 per cent because of sudden indigestible supply.

The inherent volatility in such a concentrated market is emphasised. Perhaps, too, the sluggishness of the UK market (up only 6 per cent this quarter despite huge available cash resources) is explained by the high prices of the desirable stocks.

Meanwhile Warren Buffett refuses to disclose most of his holdings of equities, to frustrate "piggybackers". Like the comparably incorrect Wim Duisenberg of the European Central Bank, he believes secrecy adds value.

Other professional money managers, though, will notice the opportunity cost of Berkshire Hathaway's $15bn of "cash equivalents". They would be sacked for the same offence in a bull market. But then, they cannot boast the same track record.



To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (4100)3/28/1999 1:07:00 PM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
*** FT Article ***

HEDGE FUNDS: New regulation warning
By Richard Wolffe in Washington
3/25/99

The US House of Representatives yesterday warned it would consider direct regulation of the hedge fund industry, if measures to supervise the industry indirectly - through the banking system - failed.

Members of the House financial institutions subcommittee urged banks to improve their scrutiny of hedge fund risks in the wake of the near-collapse of Long-Term Capital Management last year.

Marge Roukema, chairwoman of the committee, welcomed bank regulators' efforts to step up their supervision of bank lending to hedge funds. She said: "Quite frankly, I think indirect regulation, through regulation of the banks and securities firms, should be given an opportunity to work. I am somewhat worried that direct regulation will lead to hedge funds going offshore.

"I want to make it clear, however, that if indirect regulation does not work, I am willing to look at the direct regulation of hedge funds."

The warnings yesterday follow indications from influential House members earlier this month that they were considering a range of measures - from new legislation to tighter regulation - to tackle the risks posed by hedge funds to the international banking system.

However, bank regulators repeated their insistence yesterday that any efforts to regulate hedge funds would force the funds to move offshore, beyond the reach of US officials.

Instead, William McDonough, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, urged banks to improve their analysis of hedge fund operations.

Speaking before the committee yesterday, Mr McDonough said banks "must obtain comprehensive and timely financial information" from hedge funds about their risk profile and credit quality.

Mr McDonough said it was crucial for banks to measure the "potential future exposure" of hedge funds. Bank methods for calculating such exposure - notably in volatile markets - had not kept pace with the growth and complexity of hedge funds.

The activities of hedge funds are largely unsupervised. However, US regulators have issued strict new guidelines governing bank dealings with hedge funds this year, in an attempt to limit the risks posed by hedge funds to the wider banking system.

Mr McDonough said banks had "generally tightened the credit risk management standards" for hedge funds. But he added: "Memories tend to be short, and we want to make sure that. .. banks do not return to the old ways of doing business."



To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (4100)3/28/1999 1:11:00 PM
From: Lars  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15132
 
*** Bloomberg Article ***

Top Financial News
Sun, 28 Mar 1999, 1:01pm EST

Federal Reserve Likely to Leave Rates Unchanged as U.S. Job Growth Slows

Fed Likely to Hold Steady as Job Growth Slows: Economy Preview

Washington, March 28 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. job growth probably
slowed in March, keeping wage pressures from driving up inflation
and giving Federal Reserve policy-makers another reason to leave
interest rates unchanged when they meet this week.

The number of non-farm jobs probably rose by 155,000 in
March, according to analysts surveyed by Bloomberg News. That
would mark the lowest monthly jobs increase since July 1998, when
the U.S. economy added 118,00 non-farm jobs. The government will
issue its March employment report Friday.

The report probably will also show that the unemployment
rate held steady at 4.4 percent, just a tenth of a point higher
than January's 4.3 percent.

A slowdown in job growth would give Federal Reserve policy-
makers more evidence inflation isn't a threat, buttressing what
most analysts see as the Federal Open Market Committee's bias
against changing interest rates. The central bankers, who meet
Tuesday to deliberate on U.S. monetary policy, will leave
interest rates unchanged, the top 30 Wall Street bond firms said.
''I guess the one thing that could set the market back is if
the Fed announces a tightening bias on Tuesday,'' meaning they
would lean toward raising interest rates, said Jerry Zukowski, an
economist with PaineWebber Inc. in New York. Most traders and
analysts, though, expect central bankers won't change policy.

A Bloomberg News survey of the primary dealers -- the firms
that deal directly with the Fed's securities trading desk --
shows that all are convinced Fed policy-makers will leave the
target for overnight loans between banks at 4.75 percent. Most of
the respondents said the Fed will leave rates unchanged this
year.

Inclement Weather

Bad weather probably helped hold job growth down in March,
analysts said. ''There was a bad storm during the survey week,''
hurting construction and other seasonal industries, said Carol
Stone, deputy chief economist at Nomura Securities. A late-winter
storm earlier this month dumped as much as two feet of snow
across the U.S. East Coast and Midwest, cutting power to more
than 130,000 people and forcing schools to close and airlines to
cancel flights.

Still, it may take a while before employers begin to add
jobs again at the pace of the last few months.
''We got a boost from good weather in winter months,'' Stone
said. ''Now that it isn't so good, it takes some of that boost
away.''

In February, construction spending probably rose at a slower
pace than the previous month. The Commerce Department's report on construction spending, to be released Thursday, will probably
show that it rose at a 0.3 percent rate in February, slower than
January's 1.6 percent pace, according to economists surveyed by
Bloomberg News. ''That doesn't mean we're headed down,'' said Stone. ''It just means we've seen great strength, and we're looking for some consolidation.''

February new home sales, set for release Monday, probably
rose 0.7 percent to an annual rate of 925,000 after declining 5.0
percent to 918,000 in January, analysts said.

Other Reports

Other reports are likely to show the U.S. economy continuing
to grow at a breakneck pace. The Commerce Department's final
estimate of the gross domestic product for the last quarter, set
for release Wednesday, will probably show an annual growth rate
of 6.1 percent, in line with last month's estimate.

Economists surveyed expect personal income rose 0.5 percent
in February while spending rose 0.7 percent. The Commerce
Department's monthly income and spending report will be released
Thursday. The New York-based Conference Board's survey of
consumer confidence in March, to be released Tuesday, probably
remained strong, declining only half a point to 131.6.
''The domestic economy has been very strong, and these
reports are going to give more evidence of that,'' Stone said.

Still, U.S. factories, which suffered a slowdown last year,
may not be out of the woods yet, analysts said. The National
Association of Purchasing Management's index of manufacturing
activity, due for release Thursday, probably stayed above 50,
though declining to 51.7 in March from 52.4 the previous month.
Commerce Department statistics due out Wednesday, though, will
probably show that orders placed with U.S. manufacturers in
February fell 2.1 percent after rising 1.7 percent in January.

Next Week

Date Time Period Indicator BN Survey Prior

3/29 10:00 February Home Sales, New 925K 918K
3/30 10:00 March Confidence-Conf. Board 131.6 132.1
3/31 8:30 4Q f Gross Domestic Product 6.1% 6.1%
3/31 8:30 4Q f GDP Price Deflator 0.7% 0.7%
3/31 10:00 March Chicago Purchasers 52.3 52.9
3/31 10:00 February Factory Orders -2.1% 1.7%
4/1 8:30 3/27 Initial Jobless Claims 291K 289K
4/1 8:30 February Personal Income 0.5% 0.6%
4/1 8:30 February Personal Spending 0.7% 0.3%
4/1 10:00 February Construction Spending 0.3% 1.6%
4/1 10:00 March NAPM 51.7 52.4
4/2 8:30 March Unemployment Rate 4.4% 4.4%
4/2 8:30 March Avg. Hourly Earnings 0.3% 0.1%
4/2 8:30 March Change Nonfarm Jobs 155K 275K
4/2 10:00 February Housing Completions n/a 1.661M

Federal Reserve, Treasury Events

On Tuesday, the Federal Open Market Committee meets to
decide whether to change U.S. interest rates. Also Tuesday, U.S.
Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin speaks about the global economy
at North Carolina State University's Emerging Issues Forum.

U.S. Treasurer Mary Ellen Withrow speaks to the Orlando Area
Savings Bonds Kick-Off Luncheon in Orlando, Florida, on Tuesday.
On Wednesday, she speaks to the Greater Miami-Dade Area Savings
Bond Kick-Off Luncheon at Miami Lakes Technical Education Center
in Miami.

Also Wednesday, the Federal Reserve releases the minutes
from the Fed policy-makers' Feb. 3 meeting.



To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (4100)3/28/1999 1:14:00 PM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
Bloomberg Article: U.S. Stock Exchanges Discuss Going Public

U.S. stock markets, which have operated as not-for-profit membership organizations for two centuries, are talking about selling shares to the public as they confront heightened competition and escalating costs.

The Nasdaq Stock Market and the Pacific Exchange are looking at sweeping changes that might include converting seats into stock that could be traded publicly, Nasdaq and Pacific officials said. Executives of the New York Stock Exchange have had periodic, informal discussions about converting the 207-year-old market into a for-profit company, although an NYSE official said nothing's imminent.

''The existing model of an exchange doesn't work,'' said Richard Syron, chairman of the American Stock Exchange, part of the Nasdaq-Amex Market Group. ''The structure is just too goddamned slow and cumbersome.''

The NYSE, for example, is owned partly by floor brokers, who want to preserve their livelihood, and by securities firms, which as exchange customers want to keep costs low. A ''demutualized'' exchange would replace competing factions with stockholders focused on the bottom line, giving market chiefs more flexibility to run their operations as businesses.

Committees of both the Nasdaq and Pacific markets are exploring the possibility of going public. Frank Baxter, chairman of the institutional brokerage Jefferies & Co. heads the Nasdaq committee and gave Nasdaq directors a progress report on Wednesday. ''As the marketplace has changed, we're looking at ways at having the most adaptive, responsible organization,'' Baxter said.

Competition, Costs

The talk of going public comes amid growing competition among exchanges, particularly from private trading networks such as Reuters Group Plc's Instinet and from a new options venture backed by, among others, electronic brokerage firm E*Trade Group Inc.

Meanwhile, exchange costs are escalating. The National Association of Securities Dealers, parent of the Nasdaq and American Stock Exchange, plans to spend about $210 million over three years upgrading technology. Converting to for-profit companies would let exchanges issue their own stocks and bonds.

The NYSE is planning a new trading floor next year for foreign stocks and expects to build another early next century that will cost about $350 million. The exchange also wants to arrange a partnership with or buy a private trading network. The Big Board had $677 million in cash at the end of 1997, the latest figures available.

Like mutual insurance companies that demutualized, or became stock-based, U.S. exchanges also want to be able to use shares to buy other exchanges and pay top executives and employees with stock options.

While going public would be unprecedented for a U.S. exchange, markets in Australia and Sweden have already gone that route.

Top Performer

Brokers on the screen-based Australian Stock Exchange last year surrendered their membership rights in return for shares. Helped by rising volume and profit, the exchange's stock is up 74 percent this year, and is the third-best performer on its own All Ordinaries Index.

Sweden's OM Gruppen AB purchased the Stockholm Stock Exchange in 1997. It's down 23 percent in 12 months, partly on concern the exchange will lose business as investors flock to stocks of the 11 nations that adopted the euro.

''It's inevitable after what happened in Australia and Europe that some exchange in the U.S. will become a public company,'' said Dale Carlson, vice president for corporate affairs of the Pacific Exchange in San Francisco.

Any U.S. exchange considering the prospect would face high hurdles. There may be concern that a public company's focus on the bottom line would conflict with an exchange's role as regulator -- identifying and prosecuting misconduct.

Also, exchange members who lease out seats may balk at giving up six-figure incomes for shares that fluctuate. Specialists and brokers who make their living on an exchange floor may fret that a market focused on profits will decide a trading floor isn't worth the expense.

Status Quo's Merits

Moreover, the status quo has merits. An exchange's members, or owners, know their business. And unlike a public company, ''there's no incentive for an exchange to do something that's of short-term benefit that would harm it over the long term,'' said Marc Lipson, the NYSE's visiting economist.

Big Board Chairman Richard Grasso said his exchange has no plans to change its ownership.

Part of the appeal of converting to a for-profit company is efficiency. ''In a membership organization, like an exchange, you can get caught up in policy gridlock and nothing happens,'' said James Angel, an associate professor of finance at Georgetown University.

For example, the NASD last year proposed giving institutional investors, such as mutual funds, direct access to Nasdaq instead of having to place orders through brokers. Brokerages said the plan represented unfair competition and defeated it. If brokers had a more direct ownership stake, it would ''harmonize'' their interests with those of the Nasdaq, said NASD Chairman Frank Zarb.

Besides, the exchanges could use the money. At the end of 1997, the NASD had $43.5 million in cash while the newly acquired American Stock Exchange had $46 million, according to exchange financial statements. ''We're teeny compared with companies that compete against us, like Reuters,'' said Nasdaq President Alfred Berkeley.

Berkeley said a sticking point of any offering will be allocating stock. The NASD has 5,565 broker-dealer members, but just 485 make markets. ''We're trying to figure out how we can do it,'' he said.

Pacific Exchange

The Pacific Exchange, with trading floors in San Francisco and Los Angeles, is exploring changes because it's getting squeezed. The exchange steadily loses money on equities, an exchange spokesman said. He declined to say how much. The equities business accounted for less than 2 percent of listed share volume in 1997, down from 3 percent five years earlier.

The options business, meanwhile, has boomed. The exchange has one membership for both equities and options, and seat prices on the exchange have more than doubled since 1996 to more than $400,000 because of the demand to trade options. Monthly leases are approaching $10,000, twice what traders pay on the rival Philadelphia Stock Exchange.

''The Pacific is very aware of the cost differences associated with operating a post there,'' said David Herron, vice president of listed trading operations for Charles Schwab Corp. in Boston, which makes markets on the Pacific. ''All of the exchanges are looking whether the current structure makes sense.''

E*Trade is putting pressure on the Pacific. The brokerage firm and other broker-dealers plan to start a screen-based options market next year intended to cut trading costs. The Pacific operates the nation's third-largest options exchange.



To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (4100)3/28/1999 1:20:00 PM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
*** Bloomberg: Technology News ***
Sun, 28 Mar 1999, 1:15pm EST

At Home, Broadcast.com, Others Liked by Alger, Barron's Says

New York, March 27 (Bloomberg) -- At Home Corp.,
Broadcast.com Inc. and iVillage Inc. are among the stocks liked
by David Alger, chief executive of Fred Alger Management,
Barron's reported. Alger likes At Home because its the leading
company that's putting the Internet over cable television, and he
sees Broadcast.com's stock doubling from its current price by the
end of 2003; he considers it the most effective way of
disseminating corporate information to a large group of people.
Alger also recommends iVillage.com as the women-oriented Web site
branches out into more offerings like health and beauty aids and
he sees its valuation possibly doubling in two years, the paper
said.

Alger also likes medical device makers Medtronic Inc. and
Boston Scientific Corp., both of which he thinks will recover
recent troubles through cost cutting and the introduction of new
products; he also recommends drugmaker American Home Products
Corp. as it brings out new products, including ulcer, sleep and
transpant treatments.
(Barron's 3/29 28 www.barrons.com)



To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (4100)3/28/1999 1:22:00 PM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
*** Bloomberg: Technology News MSFT ***

Sun, 28 Mar 1999, 1:17pm EST
Microsoft Expected to Unveil Reorganization Monday (Repeat)

Redmond, Washington, March 28 (Bloomberg) -- Microsoft
Corp. is expected to unveil on Monday a reorganization of its
businesses into four groups based on customer types, and led by
five executives to be promoted from within the company, an
analyst said.

The world's largest software maker will name Brad Chase and
Jon DeVaan to run its new consumer group, according to Rob
Enderle, senior analyst at Giga Information Group. Jim Allchin
will run the large-business group, Paul Maritz will supervise
the software-developers group, and Bob Muglia will oversee the
group for knowledge workers, which include telecommuters and
home-office workers, Enderle said.

All the executives have worked for Microsoft for at least
nine years, and two -- Allchin and Maritz -- are on the
company's eight-member executive committee. All except DeVaan
testified at its antitrust trial.
''This is the biggest reorganization I've ever seen them
do,'' said Enderle. ''They've built products created in some
developers' mind, as opposed to meeting actual customer needs.
This is an attempt to fix that.''

Microsoft's reorganization comes after a sweeping eight-
month review of operations by President Steve Ballmer, the right-
hand man to Chairman Bill Gates. The aim is to get the software
powerhouse back on track after the landmark antitrust trial of
the past five months. Settlement talks are scheduled for
Tuesday.

Lost Momentum
''It may be time to inject new energy, some additional
people,'' said Bill Whitlow, a portfolio manager with Safeco
Asset Management Co., which owns more than 670,000 shares of
Microsoft. ''It's hard not to have lost some momentum with all
the attention on the trial.''

Microsoft currently is organized into three groups based
around technology: computer operating systems; applications; and
other activities, including its online business. The
reorganization is intended to make customers the driving force
behind products rather than technology.

Microsoft declined to comment on a date for the
reorganization or the appointments. Two weeks ago, Chief
Operating Office Bob Herbold said it would be announced ''in the
near future.''

Chase, 38, is vice president of developer relations and
Windows Marketing. DeVaan, 38, is vice president of desktop
applications. Allchin, 47, is senior vice president for personal
and business systems. Muglia, 39, is senior vice president of
the applications and tools division. Maritz, 44, is group vice
president of platforms and applications.

Under the new structure, the consumer group will include
the Windows 98 operating system and the large-business group
will include the Windows 2000 system, formerly known as Windows
NT, Enderle said. Some products, such as Office business
software, may overlap groups, he said.

Lawyers for Microsoft and the U.S. Justice Department, and
19 states suing the company, are scheduled to meet on Tuesday to
discuss a settlement proposal by Microsoft. The company stands
accused of using illegal tactics to protect its Windows
monopoly.

The trial is in recess until April.

Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft fell 1 13/16 to 178 1/8
Friday after touching a record of 180 3/8 earlier in the day.



To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (4100)3/28/1999 1:46:00 PM
From: Lars  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15132
 
*** Internut Article from Omaha World Herald 3/28/99 ***

Technology Aids New, Bold Breed of Web Traders

When Dave Kotinek bought a house in Omaha in June 1997, he worried about paying for it over 30 years.

Technology allows an inceasing number of day traders, such as Dave Kotinek of Omaha, to conduct trading on his home computer.

Last week, using part of the profits from one year of trading stocks on the Internet, he paid off the $85,000 mortgage.

Kotinek, 40, said he is up 2,300 percent on his money since he started buying and selling stocks through online broker Ameritrade about a year ago. He has doubled his money in the past three weeks alone.

By night, he sings and plays guitar in a top 40 dance band called Hat Trick. By day, he's glued to his computer screen. Kotinek trades stocks from a converted bedroom in his two-bedroom house near 72nd and Blondo Streets. Using a satellite dish, a telephone and a high-speed cable Internet hookup, he makes an average of 20 stock trades a day.

"The cool thing is, being in America, everybody can have a piece of this in your house," Kotinek says. "It's a huge river of money and everybody's got a net. If you're smart, persistent and tenacious, you're going to probably do OK."

Kotinek is one of a growing breed of investors known as day traders. Empowered with technology that gives them timely access to the markets and information, day traders make investment trades every day - often many times a day.

The Internet has given individual investors like Kotinek access to tools that once were available only to stockbrokers. Bypassing traditional brokers, these investors make their own decisions, do their own research and stay in constant touch with one another through Internet chat rooms. Although day traders existed before the Internet, the increasing popularity of online investing has brought more of them into the market.

Day traders are the most active among the growing number of investors online. Online trades accounted for 13.7 percent of all stock trades in U.S. markets in the fourth quarter of 1998, compared with 7.2 percent during the first quarter of 1997. The number of online brokerage accounts is expected to top 10 million by the end of the year, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The SEC and other securities regulators have expressed concern that many new online investors don't realize the risks of the stock market. Kotinek says he does. After some early struggles when he began investing in stocks 18 months ago, he says, he's become more and more successful with experience.

"I have huge days," he says, recalling the time he racked up a gain of $55,000 in a single day's trading. He's had big down days, too, losing as much as $20,000. But the general trend has been up. Way up.

His investment success has exceeded his own expectations. He says it's a high-risk venture that isn't for everyone. But it's been paying off big for him.

"I'm a high-risk investor and I can afford to be," he said. "I'm a single guy. I don't have a lot of responsibilities. . . . If you've got a family and are trying to make ends meet, it's probably not a good idea."

To get a glimpse of a day trader's life, a World-Herald reporter spent a trading day with Kotinek.

Over 61/2 hours, Kotinek rarely moved from his chair as he flipped through World Wide Web sites, scouting for information and keeping an eye on his stocks. He made 10 stock trades and considered a half dozen others. He shared his views on how the market works and showed how Internet investors gather and share information.

Let's join Kotinek, then, on that trading day, March 4. We'll watch as he plays his frenetic game, casting his net to try to snag some of that cash.

* * *

8:15 a.m. It's 15 minutes before the opening bell on Wall Street, and Kotinek is wired into the action. In faded bluejeans and untucked plaid shirt, he peers into his computer screen, his window on the stock market. He's ready to match wits with unseen suits in brokerage offices and online investors like him.

"Looks like it's going to be a good day," he says with anticipation. "The S&P futures are up 3. If the futures are up, you're going to have a strong opening."

8:26 a.m. Four minutes to the opening of trading. Kotinek and his technology are ready. A satellite dish on the roof brings him up-to-the-minute stock quotes through Data Transmission Network, an Omaha company. He trades through a brokerage account on the Internet with Ameritrade, another Omaha firm. He uses a high-speed Cox@Home cable Internet hookup.

CNBC, the cable stock-market channel, appears on his computer screen in a 2-inch square box in the upper right corner. The rest of the screen displays price and trading information on various stocks. Mostly, Kotinek buys and sells shares of Internet-related companies. Their stock prices often move sharply, creating opportunities for quick profit.

He watches about 30 stocks, but concentrates on about 10 that he's been tracking for months. "They're the ones I have a good feel for and where they ought to be valued," he says.

This morning, he's interested in buying shares of Digital River, a Minnesota company that helps other companies sell products over the Internet. He's made money on the stock in the past.

"I got on him (bought the stock) at about $5 (per share)," he said. "Went clear up to $60."

Since then, it's taken a dive to $31 a share. Kotinek says there is no good reason for the dip. He expects a rebound. He clicks his computer's mouse and pulls up a graph of the stock price over the past few months. "He's sitting well below the 50-day moving average," Kotinek says. "I'm going to load up on him."

Kotinek's looking to unload much of his 32,000 shares of Cozmoz.com, a California-based company that wants to buy and develop Internet businesses. Kotinek is sitting on a hefty profit on the stock, but is worried the price might plunge and wipe out much of the gain.

He clicks to an Internet message board where traders post news and gossip about Digital River. One investor says the stock will move from $31 to $35 a share today. Another warns, "$25 by Friday."

Kotinek says traders use the message boards to try to influence other investors. Some traders own the stock and want it to go up, while others have taken "short" positions that will give them a profit if the stock goes down.

Kotinek says he finds good tips here, but he classifies much of the chatter as "spam" - computer slang for junk e-mail. Still, it's one of the tools that help him spot winning stocks.

"There's no way you could be doing this without the Internet," he said. "You can see what the actual shareholders are talking about. There are all kinds of Web sites to teach you things."

Kotinek is ready to make some trades when the market opens. He calls Ameritrade and places orders to sell 10,000 shares of Cozmoz.com - half at $1.871/2 a share and half at $1.811/4.

8:30 a.m. CNBC shows that officials of the New York Stock Exchange are pounding the gavel to start trading. The game is on.

"Here we go," Kotinek says.

Some of the numbers on Kotinek's screen began to flash red, indicating a change in stock prices.

"I'm going to watch CMGI," he says, referring to CMGI Inc., a Massachusetts company that helps develop Internet businesses. "I may pick up another 100 (shares) there."

8:39 a.m. Kotinek is concerned. The price of a stock he owns, New Jersey-based bagel franchiser All-American Food Group, is going down. Since opening at 18 cents a share, it has slumped to 15. "I don't like the health of that thing," he said. "Let's chuck that thing. Whatever I sell will be profit."

He calls his broker. "Sell the rest of it at the bid price," he says. "Get me out of there. They're chucking the heck out of it."

He also places an order to sell 3,000 shares of Cozmoz.com at the market price. His orders to sell an additional 10,000 shares remain active, but the stock is trading below the price he wants.

The Dow Jones industrial average, the stock market's most widely watched barometer, is up 111 points in an early-morning surge. Kotinek says that should boost investors' confidence in stocks in general.

He doesn't put much faith in market predictions by the parade of analysts that appear on CNBC, though.

"One guy says 'Dow 10,000 by the end of March,' Then a big analyst says we're in for a major correction. It's stupid."

Kotinek calls up Ameritrade's Web site to check on his account. It shows he sold the 3,000 shares of Cozmoz at $1.78 a share.

His account also shows he sold 15,000 shares of All-American Food Group at 15 cents.

It has since moved up to 20 cents.

"That's OK," he says. "I made money on it. I'll take that."

9:02 a.m. Kotinek still wishes he hadn't missed the upward move on All-American. He's thinking of buying back in and hoping to ride it up. It's now trading at 17 cents.

He calls Ameritrade and places an order to buy 15,000 shares at 17 cents. He hopes to sell at 19 cents and pocket $300. "Chances are that's going to happen," he says.

9:10 a.m. Two things are not going well. For one, no one has bought his other Cozmoz shares. For another, All-American's stock isn't moving up.

Few buyers are interested in Cozmoz today. Only 19,000 shares have traded in 40 minutes. "How am I supposed to chuck shares when that's going on?" he says.

9:21 a.m. All-American is still sitting at about 17 cents a share. Kotinek, worried that he may lose again if the stock goes down, calls Ameritrade. "I better just chuck him and be safe," he says. He changes his sell order, lowering the price from 19 cents to 17 cents.

He also tells his broker to sell 35,000 shares of Interactive Processing, a Las Vegas-based company that operates an "online convention center." The stock sells for 3 cents a share.

Kotinek says he and many other online traders like to buy such "penny stocks" - those costing less than $1 a share in most cases. Their prices can move rapidly and they hold huge potential for gain. If a penny stock begins to move, it can attract lots of buyers in a hurry.

"It can go from 2 cents to 50 cents," he says.

Kotinek is still trying to sell hisAll-American stake. He lowers his price to 16 cents.

"The Dow's up hard today," he says. "I'm surprised these Internet stocks aren't really screaming. Nothing's moving much."

9:30. a.m. All-American's price begins to weaken again. "It looks like he's selling off," Kotinek says. "I better just chuck it."

He calls Ameritrade and orders a sale at whatever the market will pay. He fills the order at 14.8 cents a share. "Glad I got off that dog," he says. Five minutes later, he tells Ameritrade to sell off an additional 4,000 shares of Cozmoz at the market price.

Kotinek constantly watches as trades are reported on his computer. He watches for increases in trading volume, a sign that a stock may begin to move in price. And he continually calls up a software tool called DTN Chameleon. It displays and constantly updates a stock's price moves on a line graph, giving him a changing visual picture.

Kotinek said he doesn't see much action in the penny stocks today. "They'll get hot again," he says. "That's the beauty of online trading. There's more and more ignorant traders out there that will buy high."

Kotinek says those novice traders will be OK if they can accept early losses and learn fast.

He said he "got whipped" for six months in the market before he began to do well. "You have to be rational," he says. "You have to look at what you can do differently next time.

"You've got to realize that the best you can do is gain more than you lose. It's hard for a person to deal with the fact that he lost. You learn to deal with that as a byproduct of what you're doing. Your losses are your scrap."

9:39 a.m. Kotinek gets a call from his friend, Doug, a fellow online trader who lives in Omaha. Doug wants Kotinek's opinion on a stock, Bluefly Inc., an online designer outlet store based in New York City.

Kotinek calls up a one-year graph of the stock price. "I don't think it's going to tank on you," he says. "Its 50-day moving average is about where you're at."

Kotinek checks recent news stories and sees that Bluefly announced an agreement with Excite, a major Internet search navigation service.

"I think if you're looking to hold it, it's probably a decent hold," he says.

Kotinek's Ameritrade account shows he sold an additional 4,000 shares of Cozmoz.com at $1.78. "I feel good being lighter on him," he said.

It's nearly 10 a.m. and he hasn't left his chair. He acknowledges that day trading requires a lot of his time and has affected his health. He's still playing in the band four nights a week, going to bed at 2:30 a.m. and then getting up at 7:30 to prepare for the day's trading. That's not as much sleep as he'd like, and he misses the slower pace of his life before day trading.

"Day trading's not something you can do a couple days a week," he says. "You have to be inside of it and get a feel for where these stocks are going."

He said he thinks about taking his gains and stepping away from day trading for a while to "get my life back." But he's making too much money now, and he enjoys the game.

He got into it, he says, because he realized he needed to do some investing.

"It wasn't but a year and a half ago that I had no idea what these numbers meant. I'd never been in the stock market," he said. "I bought this house, and I thought, 'I've got to do a lot of playing in the band to pay for this.' I mean, am I going to be playing when I'm 70? I don't think so."

While it's hectic and stressful to trade stocks all day, he said, the lifestyle has its advantages.

"You get up in the morning and you don't have to fight the traffic. You go to your computer. You don't have to get dressed up. You don't have to take a shower. You don't have anybody breathing over your shoulder."

10:15 a.m. It isn't one of his more active trading days, but he's feeling good about what he sees on his screen. His white tom cat, Capper, sits contentedly on his lap as Kotinek watches the numbers change.

"I'm doing good today," he says. "I'm making money."

He's excited about CMGI, which is trading in the low $140s a share. "They're powerful," he says of the company. "I wouldn't be surprised if CMGI could go up 1,000 percent in a year."

He's not looking forward to filing his taxes. He'll have to provide a record of all his buying and selling to track his capital gains for the Internal Revenue Service.

"It's going to be a book," he said.

His accountant told him taxes might amount to 45 percent of his gains this year. He says that doesn't bother him. "I'm glad to have good roads and schools and the military. I'm proud to be an American."

10:25 a.m. Kotinek sees that some relatively big blocks of Digital River stock have changed hands - one of 10,000 shares, another of 15,000.

"There's big people buying," he said. "I think we saw the bottom (price). I think it's going to walk back up."

He calls Ameritrade and buys 200 shares at $32.561/4 a share.

The Dow Jones industrial average is up 156 points - a big move. He listens to an analyst on CNBC giving his view on the reason why.

"So now the big boys are saying the Dow's going up because it's oversold," Kotinek says, smirking. "Why didn't they say that yesterday? It's stupid. Yesterday they said it was going to crash because it was overvalued."

10:40 a.m. CMGI's shares dip below $140. "I said I was going to buy, but now, I don't want to," he said. "There's just a flurry of sales right now."

Over the next hour, Kotinek chats with Doug, checks out a few stocks and the message boards, but doesn't trade.

He tells about the time his computer crashed. Not wishing to miss a day's trading, he went to CompUSA, bought a new one and had his new system running the next day.

Kotinek, a native of Superior, Neb., attended Kearney State College (now the University of Nebraska at Kearney) and Hastings College, but didn't graduate, turning his attention to music.

He attended technical school in Hastings to learn to fix his music equipment. It pays off now in helping him keep his computers running.

While some critics of the online investing craze have equated the new traders with gamblers, Kotinek rejects that characterization, at least of him.

"I have no desire to go into a casino and pull a handle on a slot machine," he said. "I don't equate this with that. I think you can do it intelligently, do it with knowledge and an understanding of what your risks are."

12:15 p.m. Kotinek's interest perks up in Starnet Communications, a Canadian company that offers gambling on the Internet. The company has issued a press release touting its new sports book and casino. And Starnet will be an exhibitor at an expo for financial analysts later in the week.

Buyers are hitting the stock. The price is moving up. Kotinek calls Ameritrade and buys 500 shares at $4.50 a share.

"It's a safe little bet," he says, adding that he now owns 6,000 shares of Starnet.

1:30 p.m. The Dow Jones industrial average begins to pare some of its gains. It's still up 81 points. The Nasdaq composite index, heavy with technology companies, is down 13. Digital River has pulled back to $30.50.

Kotinek types in an order to buy 100 shares. While he has the option of trading via the Internet or phoning in an order, he usually uses the phone because it's faster, he says.

2 p.m. "I'd feel better if I could sell some of my Cozmo," he said.

A few minutes later, a buyer surfaces for his Cozmoz.com shares. Kotinek sells 5,000 shares at $1.78.

"All right. I'm down to 20,000 shares now. I'm glad I'm lightening up on that stupid thing."

3 p.m. The market closes for the day. Kotinek says he finished the day "fairly flat. I might have made a little gain. Today I feel I made good position. I got a lot of shares out of a company I wasn't feeling good about and I bought some shares of a company I thought were on sale. Overall, I feel pretty good."

* * *

Over the next three weeks, some of Kotinek's stocks soared and his Ameritrade account doubled in value. CMGI rose from the $140s to $226. Digital River climbed from the low $30s to $42. Starnet ran from $4.50 to $17.

With his Ameritrade account value at a new peak, Kotinek decided to take some money out of the game. He wrote Commercial Federal Bank an $85,000 check for his mortgage. While he was a little reluctant to spend money that he might have used to build more in the stock market, he said, it felt good to pay the debt that originally motivated him to start investing.

"It's just paper gains unless you do something with the money," he said.

Personal Comment:

I am relieved to see that this gentleman paid off his mortgage. I also believe that his last 1.5 yrs experience could be the worst thing that happened to him in terms of investing over the course of his lifetime.

I know a couple people like him, who haven't paid off the mortgage BTW, who think Mr. Market is always like the past 1.5 years with the internut stocks. I think they may be in for a surprise over the next 25 to 30 years.

There will always be opportunity to create wealth with Mr. Market but will we see the AOL's, CMGI's, et al going up 500% to 1000% in a year every year.

With this said, I still believe the internut bubble is NOT anywhere near being over. Sometimes the tide takes awhile to go out. That's when we will see who is swimming naked.