SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (53442)3/25/1999 4:14:00 PM
From: RealMuLan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike: here is a wised-up Dell bull, although a little bit late. Hope the debate on this thread helped him.
techstocks.com



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (53442)3/25/1999 4:44:00 PM
From: Eggolas Moria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
AMD, Sub-$600 PCs Record Big Gains In February
(03/25/99, 2:38 p.m. ET)
By Aaron Ricadela , Computer Retail Week
PCs priced less than $600 recorded massive gains in February, compared with one year ago, lifting the fortunes of CPU maker Advanced Micro Devices, according to market researcher PC Data.

AMD processors powered 51.4 percent of all desktop PCs sold at retail in February, thefirst time AMD's share has exceeded 50 percent, PC Data reported. Intel's unit share was 38.3 percent.

Meanwhile, retail revenue from Windows PCs sank 16 percent, compared with a year ago, according PC Data, in Reston, Va. The average selling price of a Windows PC fell 17 percent, compared with the year-ago period, to $947, while retail unit sales increased less than 1 percent, PC Data said.

Sub-$1,000 PCs accounted for 62 percent of unit sales in February, an increase of 22 percent, compared with the year-earlier period. Retail point-of-sale data from February showed the strongest gains at the lowest price points.

Unit sales of PCs priced less than $600 grew 657 percent, compared with February 1998, and accounted for 19.9 percent of all PCs sold at retail.

Unit sales in the $600-to-$1,000 price range fell 12.9 percent as the lowest sector took away sales, PC Data said. PCs priced between $600 and $1,000 constituted the largest slice of the retail market, representing 42 percent of unit sales.

Unit sales of PCs priced between $1,000 and $1,500 increased 4.6 percent over February 1998 and represented 33.3 percent of sales. PCs priced above $1,500 represented 5 percent of unit sales and posted a 70 percent unit decline.

Stephen Baker, senior hardware analyst at PC Data, said AMD and eMachines exploited the sector's changing landscape by focusing on the low end of the market, powering gains in the sub-$600 segment.

In the sub-$1,000 segment, AMD-based systems accounted for 65.7 percent of sales, while the company claimed a 73 percent share of PCs in the $600-to-$1,000 range, and a 47 percent share of the sub-$600 market.

Intel chips were found in 18.5 percent of sub-$1,000 PCs, but it led the $1,000-to-$1,500 market with a 65.7 percent share, and nearly cornered the market on higher-priced PCs, PC Data said.

Robert Fuller, AMD's director of field marketing for the Americas, said the company's "balancing act" at retail is weighing market share against reaping the highest average selling price (ASP) for systems using its chips.

"We have a responsibility to our shareholders to getting the highest possible ASP we can," Fuller said. AMD's new K6-III processor and forthcoming K7 chip aim for more robust and expensive PCs.

According to PC Data, PCs powered by an AMD processor sold for an average of $851 in February; Intel Celeron PCs sold for $917; Intel Pentium II PCs for $1,346; and Cyrix-based PCs carried an average selling price of $583.

Cyrix's market share in February was 10.3 percent, PC Data said.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (53442)3/25/1999 4:58:00 PM
From: Eggolas Moria  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
Compaq Picks A Fight With Dell In Britain
(03/25/99, 3:50 p.m. ET)
By Madeleine Acey, TechWeb
LONDON -- Compaq U.K. issued a statement Thursday saying its rival Dell is not adhering to its direct-selling policy and has instead been courting British resellers.

Compaq also called a news conference, saying Joe McNally, the company's U.K and Ireland managing director, would "expose" Dell and ask it to "come clean about its business practices."

In a written statement Compaq said: "Michael Dell and colleagues have been contacting the principals of Britain's major resellers. Dell has not only asked them to sell Dell equipment, but also to provide much-needed computer support services for Dell boxes."

Compaq representatives and some channel partners, without Joe McNally present, proceeded to attack Dell. McNally appeared briefly by video.

The subheading on Compaq's news release was: "Compaq today fired the first salvo in a new U.K. computer war with Dell."

Asked to name these resellers, Compaq marketing director Vesey Crichton turned to reseller Bill Joss of Compel. Joss said a company owned by Compel, Infoproducts, bought equipment from Dell.

"It is a myth that Dell does not work with the channel," Joss said, adding it was "generally understood" that Dell does approach resellers.

Compaq channel sales director Nick Offin said: "While they claim to be direct, in reality, they are anything but. Why have Dell been actively trying to recruit channel partners in the U.K.?"

Asked if this was another case of "mud-slinging" -- as Gartner Group labeled a Compaq anti-Toshiba campaign last year -- Crichton astonished his audience and said it was "just a bit of fun."

Dell's vice president for the United Kingdom and Ireland, Brian McBride, said he was staggered by the outburst and called the written statement "factually incorrect."

"I'm not going to waste time and money taking them to court. We haven't contacted major resellers," he said. "We are contacting no resellers today."

Of Infoproducts he said: "I've never heard of them in my life."

"But resellers are contacting us. Hardware margins are being squeezed. Dell is going to be 25 per cent of the market," said McBride. "If a customer asks, 'Will you do it through this reseller?'-- we will."

McBride said 95 percent of Dell's business is direct. "It's been so successful, why would we want to change it?" he said.

McBride said Dell was No. 2 and closing in on Compaq in the U.K. market. He described Compaq as "clearly worried" and its campaign as "school bully cage-rattling



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (53442)3/25/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: Rolla Coasta  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Hi Michael,

Is there any difference between "disposal" and "sold" in the insider info ? Appreciate your answer. -EH



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (53442)3/25/1999 5:47:00 PM
From: jim kelley  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 132070
 
MB,

For the relatively unsophisticated, P/E is what determines whether or not they get a good buy. For the more sophisticated, PEG is a more important factor in determining good buy in a stock. For the really sophisticated investor, the determining factor in a purchase is the three to five year discounted cash flow and profit of the company.

Thus, your criteria for an over priced stock is the least sophisticated of all measures.

Come on Mike you can do better than that with your MBA degree.
Greespan use the discounted cash model.

JK