SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Big Dog who wrote (40891)3/25/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: kendall harmon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Bloomberg on CLB. Looks overdone to me.

Core Laboratories Shares Fall on 4th-Qtr Profit Drop (Update2) (Updates with closing share activity in 2nd paragraph.)
Houston, March 25 (Bloomberg) -- Shares of Core Laboratories NV fell 27 percent after the oil-service company said fourth- quarter earnings dropped 8.5 percent, missing estimates, because of spending cuts by exploration companies.

The shares fell 6 1/4 to 16 15/16 in trading of 1.94 million, more than 12 times the three-month daily average. Earlier, they touched 16 1/2. Core's stock fell 6.5 percent yesterday, when it canceled plans to buy GeoScience Corp.

Profit from continuing operations fell to $5.24 million, or 18 cents a share, from $5.73 million, or 23 cents, in 1997's fourth quarter. That was well below the 30-cent average estimate of three analysts polled by First Call Corp. Revenue fell 3.7 percent to $76.8 million from $79.8 million. ''It's just catch-up now,'' said analyst William Neal McAtee of Morgan Keegan Inc. in Memphis, Tennessee, who has an ''outperform'' rating on the stock. ''It hadn't been beat up as much as the rest of the (oil-service) group.''

Core's stock rose 8.5 percent last year, compared with the Philadelphia Stock Exchange's 15-company oil service index which fell 54 percent.

Amsterdam-based Core, which analyzes oil reservoirs, said it expensed about $1.5 million of acquisition-related costs in the fourth quarter. It had no gains and charges. In the year-earlier quarter, $85,000 in income from discontinued operations gave it net income $5.81 million, or 23 cents.

Core said yesterday it canceled plans to buy GeoScience, a maker of oil-finding equipment, for $214 million in cash and stock because it believed GeoScience gave it information that wasn't true. GeoScience is 80 percent-owned by Tech-Sym Corp. and based in Houston, where Core has U.S. offices.

Core said it will take an unspecified first-quarter charge to cover the cost of forgiving $3 million in working capital advances to GeoScience and related fees.



To: Big Dog who wrote (40891)3/25/1999 11:47:00 PM
From: gpphantom  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95453
 
According to Yahoo, the short ratio on CLB as of March 8 is 15, or 1.54m shares. That's big, so one should expect the shorts to cover causing a significant "dead cat bounce."



To: Big Dog who wrote (40891)3/26/1999 10:15:00 AM
From: SliderOnTheBlack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95453
 
Big 'Un; ie: CLB -- << You DO have a plan? >>

..a plan ? - Nahh; this was a ''hip shot'' ! <VBG> .....just kidding.

CLB; hmmm lets see what we have here. First fundamentally.

We have a niche leader, an aggressive acquisitor/consolidator in a value added niche - whose value of its services rises in a declining, or difficult crude Oil price enviroment. CLB is not a high debt/high leveraged company. IT has a .39 debt/equity ratio, where .40 is the cut off for a conservative rating. They have solid cash/borrowing base available, they are strongly profitable. Return on equity is 15% plus. Small float - just 16.2 M out of 28.4 M issued. The short position which was obviously enhanced yesterday (VBG) will give us significant ''pop'' potential when the shorts do cover. Shorts piled on this wounded animal yesterday - and rightfully so if shorting is your thing...

One reason I loved this play is that CLB is not a traditionally owned oilpatch stock. CLB is disproportionately owned by non-energy funds. It has been promoted and owned as a growth/value play and as a technology stock that happens to be in the energy sector. Many of these Institutional owners use models where they sell on any earnings disappointment - this give the individual investor an advantage.

These pre-programed models serve the institutions well - but they also can serve us well, when we know the fundamental story behind the selloff.

Interesting comment from Yahoo; <<The Morgan Keegan analyst pointed out today that if you adjust for special factors, earnings were .27 instead of .30, not worthy of this kind of sell off. Add to that that revenues increased 25% year over year. >>

Technically; CLB has had a series of higher lows from September. If one draws a support line under the series of lows from Sept - we are right in the expected support range. CLB bottomed at $15 11/16ths at the end of Nov/1st of Dec peak of tax loss selling. It rebounded nicely in January and when the sectorwide retracement occurred in late Feb. - CLB held a week long bottom support level of $18 7/8ths, or so... see chart link below:

quote.yahoo.com

In my mind, making a series of entries into these one day disproportionate blowoffs has been on of the most profitable trading/buying ideas.

To make an intial entry at the $18ish level was both fundamentally and technically prudent. Especially on an otherwise up/flat day in the Oilpatch - don't discount this factor. The next entry at $16ish as well; and I will sit for my final 1/3rd at $13 15/16ths which is below prior $15ish support and gives me room for a ''Gun the Stops'' type of play if we would see that. CLB is fine, just fine... this is not like buying a high debt/fundamentally wounded company - CLB is solid. This is a good longterm buying point and an attractive trading opportunity, .... time will tell.

I'm hitting about 8 of 10 on these one day disproportionate blowoffs - gotta take the swings when you get those fastballs right down the middle of the plate... !

********************************************************************************
Hmmm; see the headline below; Oil stocks Rally - profits seen distant.

Now didn't our little professor from the Invest Ltd thread tell us that the Street would ''NOT'' look forward, and that it was all about all of those terrible present fundamentals..... Rule #1 - the Street most definitely does and will - look forward when valuing Oilpatch Stocks.

While our ''professor'' didn't get it - the real factor is that the Street will let these dogs run a bit. Remember when a Brokerage House just announced a downgrade a while back - only to say that this was so they could ''pound the table'' later.... well, see the link below from Pru.

We will get some ''leash'' here - these upgrades and the traditional inflow of cash from tax refund time will give us a boost. Sector rotation is another looming factor and Kosovo may generate some rotation if this situation expands.

The next ''idea'', or ''plan''' needs imho; to be that one should be setting price targets to continually, yes ''continually'' be taking ''some'' profits on this run up. - keywords: ''continually and some''. No need to close out entire positions, but anyone who thinks that it is not a ''when, not ''if'' situation - to where the Street will sell off this sector at the first hint of negative OPEC compliance news, or supply drawdowns is not prepared.

A 15-20% retracement off of a run to OSX 85ish would seem realistic. We look to see a OSX 72ish breakout soon and if we see no bad news and get some sector rotation - OSX 85ish is the next target. To not have a profit taking plan - with some rotation ideas as we near those levels - is to leave one merely at the mercy of the merciless Street and to leave a lot of $ on the table....

Taking profits is not a dirty word - do it; it isn't profit untill you actually take it anyway !

<<Friday March 26, 7:03 am Eastern Time

Oilfield stocks rally, profit rebound seen distant >>
biz.yahoo.com

biz.yahoo.com



To: Big Dog who wrote (40891)3/26/1999 1:37:00 PM
From: SliderOnTheBlack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95453
 
<Slide-one-in-on-the-BlackDog....how you gonna get me outta CLB?

Well ...............? You be out from where I be standing....

...gotta go - hey; MarcC will post tonight some comments on Bollinger Bands & Technical analysis - my posts will be questions ? - NOT pontifications - as this ''aint'' my strong point...but, both of my systems (elementary) quote.com & IQcharts show the same BB for PGO and a violation - and expected support at $13 7/8ths - $14 1/8ths - looks like it got it too - 50K on an uptick then 15K on another uptick....I see some constrictions on the BB's which means a break out - up or down... I see a break out upward to $16ish fwiw...but I am NOT a technician - just learning enough to be dangerous to myself... more later '

good luck all - C'Mon OSX 70 -72 !