Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Thermo Tech Technologies (TTRIF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Clement who wrote (5337)	3/27/1999 12:16:00 PM
From: Clement	Respond to of 6467

A Must read. The following is a post by the alias "Loomofthenight" titled "Mr. Chuck". Just a background as I know many of you don't follow the yahoo thread. "Simi_Chuck" is just one of the latest hypesters to emerge and attempt defending TTRIF management as one of innocence and being maliciously attacked by "naysayers", "shorters" and "traders" -- a characterisation that I deem to be quite amusing given Thermo Tech's share performance. Anyway, here goes: ********************** I am tiring from the excuses on your side. This is my first and only post. I have held on the shares for a number of years only to be disappointed in massive ineptness by management and the board of directors. I can forgive the poor management but I cannot forgive the lax response of the board of directors. As far as I can see, the directors are in alot of trouble and may be liable for conducting business practices that involved the release of inside information to selected shareholders in order to move up the price. This is a MASSIVE violation of securties law and I might remind you that statute of limitations is far from over. TTRIF comes under the jurisdiction of NASD and SEC and these organizations come down quite hard on companies that engage in this practice. How do I know they engaged in this practice? I have direct proof. I was a person subjected to MATERIAL INSIDE INFORMATION by the companies representatives. Not only that, I have documents such as account records, a self addressed affidavit, phone records and a company news release. This is all you need to prove this. I was specifically harrassed by the company who called me 7 days prior to the news release about the Korean deal. I was told the deal was a "done deal", that there was a "letter of intent" signed and that it involved 2000 tons per day, which was a massive amount of tonnage considering the company at that time had no production. This was a material event and is insdie information. The company before and after had been repeatedly warned about this activity yet did not cease this activity. This is illegal. I have plenty of statements to back this up. Mr. Cummings, I trust you have directors liabililty insurance because you may need it in the future. You see, I had lost alot of money because of this activity and false presentations by the company and as did alot of others around me who I told to buy on this information. I was specifically told by the company that this was "fresh news" and was not released to the public yet. I will provide testimony to anybody about this in a court of law. You see Chuck, alot of people have been screwed by the company who have not come forward yet and alot of the money was from hard earned savings. So grow up and understand this. I have never seen a company commit such acts and I have seen alot. I must say, if the company engages in a legal action, they are only opening up a giant can of worms of alot of unhappy people and illegal acts. Contact me only if neccesary, djohnston52@hotmail.com [PS] One more thing. This is my first, last and only post on this board, but contact me, anyone, if your in legal trouble whenever. Please do not bother me with unneccesary email however. Please, no one from TTRIF contact me either. There is no way I will talk to you.

To: Clement who wrote (5337)	3/27/1999 12:17:00 PM
From: Clement	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6467

A follow up reply from DD_Fact_Finder on Yahoo! to Dr. Cumming follows: ========================== Dr. Dan Cumming: I apprecitate that you are a busy man but I would like to know at your earliest convenience when I may anticipate a reply to my questions? While my questions are many I would be appreciative of having my first one answered with respect to your claims of "filings" with the Supreme Court of British Columbia. I have reposted your "claim" and my question here to refresh your memory. ************************************************** > Thermo Tech(tm) has already commenced legal proceedings > in the Supreme Court of British Columbia against certain > named individuals. Thermo Tech(tm) has also delivered a > formal "cease and desist" demand to individuals who have been > identified to date. Could you please advise as to what Jurisdiction of the BC Supreme Court these legal proceedings have been filed with? As "Civil" proceedings are public information once filed it would allow "Fact Finders" to verify the "TRUTH" of your statements. Past history with Thermo Tech makes one very leery of taking anything coming from the Company at face value. I await your reply so that I may verify same and subsequently the credibility of your post. ************************************************** A prompt reply to this question would be an excellent start. If you are unable/unwilling to answer my question by Monday Morning I will do the necessary "FACT FINDING" myself. I will call every BC Supreme Court Jurisdiction and inquire with the Registry to see if any actions have been filed showing Thermo Tech Technologies as the plaintiff. Each call will be logged and the results documented. I also note that your "claim" is one of plural so I anticipate that I will be obtaining information on more than one "filing". Furthermore, as per your request, I will be calling from time to time seeking the "true facts" about some concerns I have, some of which I have listed in my prior post and some that I have not. These will be random calls and I may voice the same concerns on more than one occasion to assure that I evoke the same reply of "true facts". Where possible I will confirm them from outside sources. Be aware that any conversations I have with anybody at Thermo Tech Technologies will be recorded. May I also remind you that taped coversations are admissible in a Canadian Court of Law as long as one of the parties in the conversation authorizes the recording. Of course that would be me! This should not be of any concern to you or anyone else for that matter at Thermo Tech Technologies since we have been assured by yourself that we could call for the "true facts". Of course if we don't get the "true facts" that you have assured us then there would be a cause for concern, a demand for accountability and possible legal recourse. I anxiously await your reply and thank you for your time and your assurance that we can finally get the "true facts". Have a nice day!!!