Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (30019)	3/26/1999 2:08:00 AM
From: J T	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

"Heck anyone can make a mistake, even DOJ." From this comment you come up with all of the BS below? "Not only are you saying something about them, but it sounds like you are saying the DOJ would not be an accurate source to me. I guess you didn't outright say they were lying, there Mr. Clinton, but it sure sounds like you are saying they are a flawed source." Amazing imagination you have there jhild! All he said was "anyone can make a mistake" jhild! NOT...DOJ would not be an accurate source...they are a flawed source. You should be writing SCI-FI jhild! Anyone can make a mistake jhild...even you when you decided to team up with Rosario and the SEC KNOWS all about him jhild TRUST me on this one because I reported him. Guilt by association jhild? You did use him just like you're using colleenb! PEACE JT

To: jhild who wrote (30019)	3/26/1999 8:03:00 AM
From: LegalBeast	Respond to of 43774

Wrong again, Mr. FRAUD! As much as you would like this to be something else, it is only about your FRAUD. I supppose that you are trying to tell everyone that a press release is more reliable than court records? <<<<Note to DOJ: LegalBeast apparently believes you issue flawed Press Releases joining non-existent suits against his friend.)>>>>> Only ONE release here, MR. FRAUD, and YOU know it to be flawed. Your insistance on making it plural convicts you yet again of FRAUD. I have told you before, I don't know the man. I don't care if he is guilty or not. He is not the issue, you are. Your insistance that I have any association with him is also FRAUD on your part, and you know that to be true also. Am I wrong Mr. FRAUD? Come up with a case number, Mr. FRAUD. Or are you going to continue to insult everyone's intelligence by claiming that you are right even in the face of so much evidence against you. Facts Lad, Facts will be the only way you have out of this FRAUD! What is interesting here is how you cling to free speech to support your right to say anything no matter how FRAUDULENT, and yet you want DOJ to come and get me. I am scared ... wooo wooo wooo ... Come and get me. It is no secret where I live and who I am. Unlike your cowardly self who hides behind a FRAUDULENT anonynomous name.