SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Gold who wrote (10524)3/26/1999 7:42:00 AM
From: Mike Gold  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25548
 
If you look at the IP anomoly for the relative position of Hole 5-it shows that hole 5 cut through a piece of the IP anomoly around 100 meters-then a barren area then cut back into IP anomoly around 200 meters which appears to continue at depth. The breccia body(s) appears in a N-S cross section to be slightly "S" shaped. The IP easily explains the depth of the minerlization and the zones of where minerlization was hit. Neat.



To: Mike Gold who wrote (10524)3/26/1999 7:49:00 AM
From: superdow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25548
 
mike are these calculations right?

the news release says 20 g/ from 110-113
it also says 11 g. from 106-113

doesn't this indicate that there is only about 2g/m in 106-109 range
from 110- 113 = 80 (4 x 20 = 80)
from 106 - 113 = 88 (8 x 11 = 88)

106 -109 area therefore equals 2 grams per meter(4 x 2 = 8)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News