SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom who wrote (21940)3/26/1999 10:47:00 AM
From: Renamed  Respond to of 44908
 
Tom Young Reverse Info

Look in here.

techstocks.com



To: Tom who wrote (21940)3/26/1999 10:53:00 AM
From: REW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44908
 
When I posed the question to Gordon as to whether there would ever be a reverse split for the purpose of reducing the share count and elevating the share price, the answer was NO. He said any decision made would always have the shareholders interests in mind.

There are always the possibilities of share count movement as a function of purchasing another compant or merging with such. As long as the result is a NASDAQ listing, that action would be definitely be in the shareholders interest. Only time will tell what method will be required or utilized when the actual contractual determination is made.



To: Tom who wrote (21940)3/26/1999 11:08:00 AM
From: slaffe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 44908
 
Hi Tom

There have been numerous posts regarding obtaining a nasdaq listing which imho is only a matter of time. There are three possible ways to get this listing.

1) reverse split to get the share price over $4

2) reverse merger into a nasdaq listed company.

3) share price of tsig matures to $4+ and holds over a thirty day period.

Number one won't work. This will shake investor confidence and those investors that invest in otc bb penny stocks imho will flee for the exit doors regardless of how fundamentally sound tsig may be, driving the price down and defeating the very purpose.

Number three would be a ideal way. However that may be a long (?) process. By long I mean anywhere from 4 months to ? I cite 4 months as that is approximately when the 2q 10q will be out. Many here consider 4 months to be to long of a time to wait as is evidenced by the number of sells. Tsig has a average daily volume of 840k, if there was a wide preponderance of buys over sells, we would be at $4+ long before now.

Number two would give us a nasdaq listing right away and I for one have no fear of RG doing a reverse merger for I have complete faith in him and the rest of the management. A lot of people do not understand a reverse merger. For clarification of one I suggest you read the scmi thread and then the hits thread. They recently did a rs. I took a small position in scmi, primarily to have first hand experience of a rs. I bought 1000 shares of scmi @.32, probably the 52 week high, I have no idea because I did virtually no dd on scmi. I did dd hitsgalore and liked what I saw. During the reverse merger, scmi did a reverse 1 for 7 reverse split. I now own 143 shares of hits which is currently trading @ 5 1/8 on the bid. 143 times 5 1/8 equals $732.
Not bad for a original investment of $320 in one weeks time. I will also receive 1000 shares of ihsi--whoever they are LOL, who will be taking over the old business of scmi. One of the reasons that made me decide to do this was the resignation of all of the scmi management. They have nothing to do now with hits.

In closing let me remind you of the three m's of investing, particularly in the microcaps. management, management, management.
I have complete faith that the management of tsig will do the right thing and increase shareholder value accordingly.

Steve

edit... hits now at 5 1/2 on the bid. Would anybody here mind if tsig did a reverse merger that gets this kind of results?

Viva Las Vegas!!!!



To: Tom who wrote (21940)3/26/1999 11:25:00 AM
From: FREAKAZOID  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 44908
 
Tom--> reverse merger..not reverse split. EOM