SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: waltertx who wrote (27186)3/26/1999 1:03:00 PM
From: Forest Gump  Respond to of 27968
 
I own a medium sized staffing firm and I can tell you that FAMH has screwed that up also...

I am in Houston walterx, How about a meeting at Mens Club or Treasures to see who you really are.

Arfi Madman should go directly to Jail but I think he should be able to collect his $200 as he will be there a long time and ciggaretes aren't cheap.



To: waltertx who wrote (27186)3/26/1999 2:15:00 PM
From: R. Murphey  Respond to of 27968
 
waltertx, Glad to see you opening up a little. A few thoughts on your post, remembering it's only one humble opinion on the situation.

1) "our group as a whole has decided to exercise theire preogative to cumulate our votes at the shareholders meeting."

If anyone had a doubt, I guess that ends it.

2)"2. We believe that Mr Lee. you are out to destroy the company and hence our investment. What make you think that any client would work with a company that has been forced in to receivership. There are more than 300 PEOs in california the clients could move instantly."

It certainly appears the company has been doing the "destroy" thing just fine, ALL by itself, and wiped out the investments of potentially thousands of shareholders. Glad to hear you were not one of those suckers. Yep, Firamada issued tens of millions of shares valued at let's speculate, $20 million, so, where is all that shareholder equity today (I'll re-address this in #4 below.) All that money ....GONE? At the end of 1997 there was an accumulated shareholder equity deficit of $1.3 million, .....almost equal to the 1997 GROSS revenues and current liabilities seven(7) times greater than current assets. That's, (I seem to recall in ACCT:101) "insolvent". As far as clients moving easily, there is already evidence of that. Check out the reduction in gross revenues between 1996 and 1997, and then ask what happened to the $30-33 million of additional(beyond Myriad's May'98 "55 million") business that was just awaiting the final inking of the Myriad acquisition. This all occurred while Mr. Lee and others were cheering the greatness of Firamada and company management. Something caused them to change their minds.

3) " This shows that none of you have any knowledge of the PEO or the staffing business."

What we do know, is that a company HAS to have profits to survive long term, that is IF it really is a business. This means, and I'm sure as a CPA you'll agree, that sales have to have net profit margins AFTER ALL costs of goods, overhead, taxes, etc. are paid. That is, at the end of the year, there's something left in the till other than borrowed money and a fist full of IOU's.

4) " I am a CPA and have my own small staffing company in Houston. I know what I am talking about and do not need approval from any one."

As a CPA, you're already aware of what's painfully wrong with Firamada's financial and legal picture, including the ominous issue of failing to pay employee withholding taxes, while borrowing from them to use in operations or otherwise. So, waltertx where has all that money gone?? Additionally, I fully understand, or maybe I'm trying to comprehend, why you, as a competitor to Firamada, are busy financing their business. Send them checks, that's what they need, or at least some of your super high profit margin accounts. But you're right?????????

5) "Mr. You are looking for consulting work and you are using the shareholders monies to try and force firamda to hire you as such."

Firamada has hired lots of consultants, just look at what has been paid in "professional" fees, look at the herd of PR firms, look at Mr. Monas. Firamada appears to have focused solely on consulting expertise to pump the stock price. Lot's of money was spent on achieving stock price via stock promotion when good, solid business practices would have accomplished much, much more. Any consultants worthy of existence would have recommended critical major changes in the way business is done. Since that has not occurred internally, it is up to shareholders , in the interest of protecting their investments, to effect change in any way available, such as the system of checks and balances available to oppressed minority shareholders.

Regards,
Bob.



To: waltertx who wrote (27186)3/26/1999 7:57:00 PM
From: Dick Lee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27968
 
Walter: Thank you for responding to my post and coming back with some interesting points. Bob Murphey has responded to your post and I would like to add my 2 cents worth.

Let me respond to each of your points:

1. Our group as a whole has decided to exercise their prerogative to
cumulate our votes at the shareholders meeting>>
_________________________________________________

Obviously the company bye-laws allow for this. Our group will also be notifying Mr. Sukey that we will cumulate our votes.

2. We believe that Mr Lee. you are out to destroy the company and hence our investment. What make you think that any client would work with a company that has been forced in to receivership. There are more than 300 PEOs in california the clients could move instantly.
_____________________________________________________________

FSAAA, and I am a part of FSAAA, is not out to destroy the company nor our investment (most of which has been lost already), we are focused on bringing it back from the brink of disaster which is where it sits today. We strongly believe that Mr. Adam is the major problem, the reasons have been cited here many times and our focus is on removing him from the company. As long as he remains, this company is going to continue to languish.

Regarding Receivership, this is the only viable vehicle for the minority shareholders. Can companies be successfully run/managed under Receivership? Yes. It happens every day. In the perfect world would we prefer to operate without a Receiver, of course.... but do you think Mr Adam is just going to volunteer to walk out the door tomorrow? Neither do I!

Our differences are clear:

a. You believe that Firamada is financially sound, making money and ready to grow profitably. We believe, and have a substantial amount to evidence to show, the company is insolvent and has a deep hole to climb out of (we do not know what the total liabilities are, we should but we don't, we have been on record requesting the 1998 income statement and balance sheet from the company since January 26, 1999).

b. You have a lot of faith in Mr. Adam's ability to lead and manage this company.

We have zero faith in his abilities (if you want some evidence: i. Take a look at the company's financials for 1996 and 1997 (and 1998 if you can get your hands on them). ii. Look at what has happened to the stock price over the past 12 months, plus a whole lot more).

c. You believe what he tells you. We do not believe anything he says any more.

As our starting points are at different ends of the spectrum, it is easy to see why we have opposing views.

3. This shows that none of you have any knowledge of the PEO or the
staffing business.
____________________________________________________________________

None of our group has claimed that we are experts in the PEO business. We know that for the company to even stand a chance of surviving, it must be financially rehabilitated. It wouldn't matter what business Firamada is in, if we don't fix the internal management problems, get the accounting systems installed, bring some accountability into the equation, etc., the business is doomed.

4. I am a CPA and have my own small staffing company in Houston. I know what I am talking about and do not need approval from any one.
____________________________________________________________________

That's fine, you can stay as the lone wolf on the plain.

5. Mr. Lee you are looking for consulting work and you are using the
shareholders monies to try and force Firamada to hire you as such.
_________________________________________________________________

How do you know what I am looking for? Have you ever talked to me on the subject? Firamada cannot afford my per diem.

I have put a lot of time and effort into FSAAA because I have lost $17,000 courtesy of Mr Adam. All told, shareholder losses are $50 million. Right now I'm in this with others to help shareholders recover some of their losses and I haven't, along with the many others who are manning this effort, billed them a nickel for my time.

It's unfortunate that you have had such a bad experience with consultants. Used appropriately they can be a tremendous resource. Used the way Firamada has used them in the past, they were a disaster and it did cost us a lot of money (several millions to be exact).

As I said in my prior post, the problem is "you don't know what you don't know!" Until you start to question Mr. Adam about what is really going on, study the numbers and dig into how the company has got itself into the mess it's in, you will continue to remain star struck by Mr. Adam and not know what's really been going on.

With best regards, LTBFV through FSAAA, Dick



To: waltertx who wrote (27186)3/27/1999 1:29:00 AM
From: Jim Johnson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27968
 
walter,

<<our group as a whole has decided to exercise theire preogative to cumulate our votes
at the shareholders meeting.>>

Just who is this group? I've got the balls to post MY name....why not yours? Theirs? Go ahead....if you have any balls at all. HHmm...I suppose he could be a eunich. I wonder if eunich's can vote their shares???

Jim J