SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito who wrote (8530)3/26/1999 2:26:00 PM
From: David Colvin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10072
 
Allen,

Thanks for the clarification. I was somewhat puzzled by the content of your previous post....it did seem rather uncharacteristic of you.

I guess I get a bit touchy at times....especially on this thread. *g*

Dave



To: Cogito who wrote (8530)3/26/1999 2:50:00 PM
From: Ken Pomaranski  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10072
 
<< Like you, I object to people taking the attitude that those who don't see things the way they do are either stupid or delusional. In my opinion, many of Ken's posts in the past have come off like that. >>

My 'flaw' is that I have a low tolerance for stupidity, and personal attacks based on one's position. I know for a FACT that I would be worshipped as a god if I tore apart the bear's position like I have the bull's position. The problem is that I just cannot do that based on the data that I see.

with regards to the first item, I lose patience with the outlandish 'bullish spin' that gets put on any data. It's worse than the White House. Data is data, and it tells the real truth when the blinders are taken off. For 2 people to look at ALL THE DATA, and come up with two diametrically opposing positions, means only that one or the other is looking at the data in the wrong way. Period. Time has PROVEN, beyond a doubt, that the bulls have looked at the data wrong. It's that simple...

I'll lay out the data in my next post.

gotta run,

kp