Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Technical Analysis - Beginners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TA2K who wrote (9955)	3/26/1999 4:34:00 PM
From: Richard Estes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12039

Then you have decided to use a MACD, which one? When you tested it on this and other (20) stocks, how did it test? If it gave you the trades you wanted, will you use MACD to get out? If not what? You might be right on hunch, Ewave, Gann says 2.25, that it won't close at new highs on this run. There is resistance at 2. There are many tools that offer a predictive measure. As I have said many times, Ewave, Fionacci, and Gann I feel are the best. I have never heard of your BB method, protect your profit.

To: TA2K who wrote (9955)	3/26/1999 6:37:00 PM
From: TA2K	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12039

Craig, This thread is probably more relevant to your post.... In your model of predicting behavior, what might be three or four of the top factors? State the statistical equation specifically so that we may get a good idea of where you're coming from. Then let's consider what could possibly be analogs to these in the prediction of future price movement of a stock. The approach sounds reasonable, but I'd like to see it discussed one step at a time. Thanks, Nicholas