Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Boplicity who wrote (6918)	3/26/1999 5:42:00 PM
From: JayPC	Respond to of 29970

Thnx for the post Could RR and @HOME merge? TJ - could happen, makes sense Could Worldnet become part of @HOME? TJ - makes sense, could happen Regards Jay

To: Boplicity who wrote (6918)	3/26/1999 5:48:00 PM
From: Richie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

GM, Thanks for the article, a very concise, no BS article. RichieH

To: Boplicity who wrote (6918)	3/26/1999 6:12:00 PM
From: Educator	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

Greg- Thanks for posting that Jermoluk interview. Is that guy aggressive or what? I like his style and vision. I'm glad he's in my (our) camp. We know there is a market and potential in the U.S., but think what can happen as @Home grows overseas. Look out! Thanks again for posting the article. It's another reason I am bullish on @Home. Ed

To: Boplicity who wrote (6918)	3/26/1999 11:18:00 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

This mid-manager level CEO didn't answer one question. He's a puppet. He never has been a factor in the company's success. The reason why he is CEO is that all the principals couldn't agree to having anyone effective. Someone who could make things happen would inevitably move in a direction contrary to at least the interests of one of the partners. So Jermoluk is functioning in the same way RR's CEO is. I have made many disparaging remarks about this guy because he is not qualified. Qualification does not mean having an MBA from Harvard. That's disqualification or maybe just dysfunctional. In any event the proof of his lack of qualification comes from what he's done and how he's done it. The details are in many of my posts since '97, but the telltale is that he operates a kind of reincarnation of the glorious AAPL hippy culture. In that kind of regime Someone is doing something but no one knows who is doing it or what is done.