Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: teevee who wrote (16966)	3/26/1999 8:16:00 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 26850

Yes, of course ... i was looking for a tonnes per square metre of grid area figure, just to use as a rule of thumb ..... anybody have a tonnes per cubic metre of Snap Lake Kimberlite figure? ...... cheers, teevee - have fun and take care.

To: teevee who wrote (16966)	3/26/1999 8:40:00 PM
From: average joe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26850

Dave Pescod, you can't mine a one metre thick sequence of kimberlite under water. There is no way any company will set up shop to mine a measly seven million tonne deposit. Give it a shake Oro Nevada or PSM or PAR but this loser? Come on! average joe

To: teevee who wrote (16966)	3/27/1999 3:01:00 AM
From: brian krause	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26850

Anyone, Trying to get an idea on where Walt said the mag lows were located. Given the info we have on the sheet being drilled on the NW peninsula and other info I can gather such as ice flows ect would reason to predict a pipe approx. 1000 meters North North West of CL 186? If this were the case then I could possibly assume that CL-186 is a vertical dike that came up through a jumbled mess of what was once sediment but had been gouged and piled by ice flows. The sheet theory does not hold true for the NE Arm but rather the sheet will trend towards the North East Inlet of Snap Lake at depth. The mineral train is not evident in the North East Inlet because of the depth of the volcanics and shows in the South East Inlet because of "vertical dikes' located on the pile of rubble (piled sediment) that is the NE Arm. The sourse ran along the sheet till it hit this and became vertical. Does this make any sense? If it does and the pipe is located in the NE Inlet then it is not such a big deal to mine as this is only 500 meters accross. bk