Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Lurgio who wrote (25275)	3/26/1999 9:17:00 PM
From: JGoren	Respond to of 152472

As we on the thread have said for about three years, the ticket is "Qualcomm Inside."

To: Jim Lurgio who wrote (25275)	3/26/1999 9:41:00 PM
From: Ramsey Su	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Jim, it is not my fault that you invested your retirement money in IDC instead of QC, so please don't take it out on me. You know what you are and I cannot help you. Only you can help yourself. Please leave me out of your troubled life. Ramsey

To: Jim Lurgio who wrote (25275)	3/26/1999 9:42:00 PM
From: Ruffian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Jim, Pisano, No more Wine. <eom>

To: Jim Lurgio who wrote (25275)	3/27/1999 10:28:00 AM
From: METMAN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Jim you said, "As Ramsey said it looks like ERICY got ripped off because the Q got rid of the infrastructure and I agree but why would the Q agree to invest with ERICY in what they sold that lost money ?" My thoughts are this: If indeed, ERICY has inroads into markets that Q doesn't, then simply put, you gain some doors that are all ready open, in other words, you gain opportunity - which may or may lead to reward. But without the opportunity, you have no chance for reward. As you say, there is still some risk here, but the ratio seems to have dropped some in the past few days with the reward becoming more important. Time will tell, -metman