Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Legal proceedings via SI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (219)	3/26/1999 10:16:00 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 242

Yikes. Nobody has ever answered me when I asked if you could sue for libel when the wronged party is using an anonymous alias.

To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (219)	3/26/1999 10:51:00 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!	Respond to of 242

Cheeky, Well, I quickly read VBroady's posts and some of Ken's posts. Here's some quick observations: 1) In my opinion, Ken has no grounds to win a suit. Period. End of discussion. Some name calling and stuff like that, but nothing libelous. 2) Ken could proceed with a lawsuit just for the harassment value it might have. But that runs the risk that VBroady could actually prove his name calling allegations, and I don't think Ken would want to be a "court certified" nut. Besides that, Ken might end up having to pay all costs for both sides of the litigation, which he might not really like. 3) In my opinion, VBroady seems to be a good judge of people. <g> KJC