To: Jim Parkinson who wrote (3621 ) 3/28/1999 3:59:00 AM From: Maurice Winn Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 29987
Message 8559791 A good post from Valueman on Loral thread. A couple of points from it: 2) The Iridium cloud. This is a big problem. As someone just mentioned, there are doubters on the viability of MSS, as there were for cellular when it started, or CDMA when QCOM introduced it. Having doubters is not a problem, but it forces one to reassess the market for MSS services. Is there a market? Many studies say yes. Well, it is time to do our own research. If there is a market, the service providers will know. If they believe there is a substantial demand, they will be ramping up accordingly. They will treat G* as a cellualr extension, not a niche service. It will become just an extension of every service plan. How do we find this out? There are gateways available at startup for the following countries--US, China, France, Italy, Korea, Argentina. Those areas are served by Airtouch(US), France Telecom/Alcatel, also known as TESAM(France, Argentina), Alenia/ElsagBailey(Italy), Hyundai(S.Korea), and China. I won't do anything about China at this time. I can call Airtouch Monday morning--they should also be familiar with Vodafone's plans in South Africa, which fires up early on too. I can call France Telecom/Alcatel and Alenia if I can track down the correct person. I'll leave Hyundai out at this time too. So, we can find out exactly what these service providers are thinking when it comes to marketing, target users, the mechanics of using the service, etc. Will Airtouch ask QCOM to put both 800 Mhz and 1900Mhz terrestrial cell chips in the phones(that gets you the ability to use that phone in many more places than the currently planned 800Mhz only--throws in Sprint and Primeco subs)? Will the other operators in the US be able to offer G* service, and if so, how? If not, why not? Plenty of other questions, but you get my drift. 6) Cash/Acquisitions/G*--With G* financing looming over Loral like a high yielding axe, the acquisition machine known as Bernard Schwartz has been shackled. That concerns me. I hate to see $$$ wasting away in money markets. The juicy deals that might have been made with Asia and Latin America in shambles get further away as those areas improve. On the other hand, that China devaluation talk is getting louder each day, so we may get our chance yet. Anyway, we have seen that acquisitions are key to Loral's growth. Skynet, SatMex, and Orion are now the cash flow generators in the lineup after a rocky start. I bet the next acquisitions are much smoother. They are out there, but we need some clarification on G* financing before Schwartz can "do the deal." Time is of the essence here. I don't care if you dilute me, get the financing squared away and get on with the plan. One from RocketScientist:Message 8561867 And RMiethe:Message 8565564 Vman disagreed on the backup to Zenit: I would strongly disagree here. The Zenit went down in September. A contingency plan would have had a launch on Soyuz or Delta ready to go within the month. Those rockets were not scheduled, nor were they ready. Nothing was ready. The TSA problem allowed Loral to save face. It gave them the time to draw up the contingency plan and execute it. The blame was put on the TSA troubles, when, in reality, it saved them. Through luck or whatever, it has worked out so far. One can go back to Schwartz's own comments and know without a doubt they were not ready for any disaster--he stated that they could get by fine if the third Zenit crashed, would have a 3 month delay if the second one crashed, and they were hosed if the first one crashed(ok, he probably didn't put it that way, but he might as well have). Maurice