Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : 1st Net Technologies ( FNTT ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chatty who wrote (995)	3/27/1999 12:27:00 AM
From: Tom Swift	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1827

Libel, Chatty -- slander is verbal, libel is written. Did you go to college? If so what is you degree? Obviously not law.

To: Chatty who wrote (995)	3/27/1999 12:34:00 AM
From: Graystone	Respond to of 1827

Good Evening Mr. Chatfield or I understand you work for this company ? Are you aware that they have staged a conversation here on SI, perhaps you would care to explain that ? Are you aware of this article, published on the thread earlier ? #reply-8431640 Are you, in all confidence of course, aware that this man may be the Greg Writer posting on this thread ? I am still awaiting his answer to my inquiries. The person in that article seemed extremely unethical in regards to financial transactions involving stocks, and lied to the NASD, at least according to the NASD he did. Arrogant son of a bi*h too, can you imagine going out and doing exactly the same type of scam again and getting caught. I wonder if Idaho enjoined* him. Good word eh ?, enjoined.<g> Do you think Greg Writer is a trustful divestment advisor ? Are you of the same persuasion ?

To: Chatty who wrote (995)	3/27/1999 12:38:00 AM
From: Tom Swift	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1827

Chatty, please respond to me in public. I have no desire to talk to you in PM and will post all further PMs from you to me from you in this thread. Regards, Tom

To: Chatty who wrote (995)	3/27/1999 12:58:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1827

Chatty (Jeff), the written record seems to support what John G has said. To summarize, your NASD file shows you were employed by Brennan Ross Securities between 9/6/90 and 1/20/91: Start Date: 09/06/1990 End Date: 01/20/1991 Positions Held: Employing Firm: BRENNAN ROSS SECURITIES, INC. Firm CRD Number: 18363 Office of Employment Address: ENGLEWOOD, Colorado 80111 An article published on 2/1/91 said: Also charged as part of the scheme were The Oxford Group Inc., Gregory D. Writer Jr., Garold N. McGaugh and Dennis E. Evanson, all of Colorado Springs, Colo.; John E. Bradley and Brennan Ross Securities Inc., both of Englewood... Unless the scheme took place prior to 9/6/90 or after 1/20/91, it does appear you were employed by Brennan Ross at the time. Do you dispute that? Also, did you know Greg Writer at that time? - Jeff

To: Chatty who wrote (995)	3/27/1999 4:44:00 AM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1827

Chatty, one of the best indicators I have found for finding a company that deserves to be sold short is a company that will launch or threaten a lawsuit in order to silence it's critics. In my opinion, quality companies silence their critics through performance on in the arena of business, not through litigation. In my opinion, it is especially suspicious that you threaten this action over posts of easily verifiable facts. It does not speak well to your character, in my opinion. It is a fact that the truth is a complete defense. Another great indicator (in my opinion) of a company that is a great short sell is when company officials have time to chat with investors, either by phone or on the 'net. This thread looks like the motherload. Barb

To: Chatty who wrote (995)	3/27/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1827

GOOD ONE, Chatty!! Way to go!! That's telling 'em!! Somehow this reminds me of an old SNL skit: a young woman earnestly asks a sleazy lawyer: "I'd really like to sue someone, but don't I have to have a reason?

To: Chatty who wrote (995)	3/27/1999 12:05:00 PM
From: Q.	Respond to of 1827

Dear Vice President for Investor Relations Chatfield: Thank you for your response. I am always glad to hear the thoughts of an investor relations spokesman. It can be helpful in making my investing decisions. Best regards John G