SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Howard Feinstein who wrote (54973)3/27/1999 11:49:00 AM
From: Captain Jack  Respond to of 97611
 
Howie--- that would not be a good thing to do..Hang in here... Many of us have too much CPQ and are waiting (hoping) for the price to rise. CPQ has done it to many of us in the past,, it will remain a trading issue for me as always as for one of the big dogs it has volatility--- I just jumped at what was thought to be the bottom and found it was only the middle. Masons big mouth was never considered as who would think any one in that position could do such a neophite act. So far it has always come back and is expected to again.. but "defrauding" is not one of the words in my my mind. Try assinine, lucky, stupid,... and the list goes on.... lucky is the key word as it will be back... wehen is the question!



To: Howard Feinstein who wrote (54973)3/27/1999 4:32:00 PM
From: Kenya AA  Respond to of 97611
 
Howie: Not only am I the "least greedy" person on this thread - I am also the "most real" person on this thread. <ggggg>

Let's suppose CPQ makes it's earning's number but the CC is not as terrific, with caution on forward looking revenues and growth, then what?

Then we get flushed down the toilet.

Look at Micron, beat estimate by 8 cents and slammed!

Classic "buy on the rumor, sell on the news."

As far as the rest of your comments go, I find it amusing that you think I'm "touting" CPQ. I am under the impression that some on this thread think just the opposite. Admittedly, I was being a bit sarcastic. Look, I can sympathize with you because you are an "investor" in CPQ. I am not. Please try to understand my comments from that perspective.

K