Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: golden_tee who wrote (438)	3/27/1999 3:16:00 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

ALTIF has hung around $7-$8 with only a few blips either way, since May. DTLN was up 25% several months afer Bill's initial recommendation, before collapsing. And you are acting as if three weeks' stock action proves anything? Not even to mention how VLNC's rise was supposedly "Wexler panicking" but the corresponding drop was the fix being put in. As for those 1.4 million shares short: I notice 1.25 million of those were short at least a month before Bill's initial rec. So at worst we're responsible for 150,000 shares and realistically it's probably a lot less. So enough about "how much money" the short side has left. Do you know how much money is short on companies like WCOM and CSCO? We are just days or weeks from a major upward move in VLNC's share price, and there is not much time left to cover. Oh, yes, the short side is really piling on with the scare tactics, huh? I suppose next we'll hear of a contract sitting on the CEO's desk, just awaiting his signature?

To: golden_tee who wrote (438)	3/27/1999 3:20:00 PM
From: Michael	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

My friend Robert: I have no position in VLNC.!!!!!! I am not part of any short conspiracy. The facts about VLNC are that 1) Have yet to prove their technology is worth anything. 2) The battery technology business is immensely competitive. It is very hard for a reasonable person to believe that a small yet to be successful company can possible stand any chance against competitors like the consortium of Major Automobile companies. This consortium just spends billions (each year), hires all the top graduates in every field that is connected with battery technology. Of course companies like General Electric and the major electric utility companies managed to spend several billion dollars on developing battery technology, also. Then there are a whole slew of companies that spend hundred million plus on battery technology. Now how much money is VLNC spending to maintain their competitive edge? (pssst…. , the secret is this little black box, don't show anyone yet… just wait any day a secret contract that is already on the CEO desk will be announced and all the shorts will be crushed) this a wrong answer DO NOT GIVE ME THIS BS AS A RESPONCE sure is a nice day