Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Rock Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (1033)	3/27/1999 6:35:00 PM
From: the Chief	Respond to of 1996

From what i can see, the IP covered this area (green lines) magma.ca The evidence of both Cu and Au is based on two things geophysical data and alterations and the somewhat continuous fault that runs in this district. Los Pelambres and El Pachon are large deposit porphries. The proximity to Los Pelambres and El Pachon "one mountain over...valley seperates Coiron from them increase the odds that the mountain range may have been made in the same period and different temperatures. Although Los Pelambres has minimal visibles nor actual gold, we have numerous indicators on the property!! From the little I know of the Silltoe model for a Gold/copper porphry, Coiron fits the model. I have heard this a number of times in the past...all unsupported at this point. The company remains firm on the fact that the original drilling was for "indicators only. I am not convinced (completely) I think they missed the deposit, plain and simple. My understanding is that the majors who have signed CA's are now looking over the data and will or will not make a proposal, based on their findings. My bet is that they will (but I know little!<gg>) So the short answer is...we have a big anomaly...the rest is speculation with little evidence other than what is described above.....but if there were more fact, then it wouldn't be an .18c stock....!!!! Your opinion? the Chief