To: Venditâ„¢ who wrote (8166 ) 3/27/1999 8:01:00 PM From: tang Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 41369
Vendit, AT LEAST WE AGREE THAT AOL SHOULD MAKE AS MANY PARTNERS AS POSSIBLE IN ALL CHANNELS but not own them out right . Yes, I have all the 'toys' you described plus more, but we must admit that the majority of PC user's income is not above $100,000, that is why the sub $600, sub $400 PC grow carzily, because there are people who wants PC for their kids but cannot afford it, there are people who wants internet but cannot afford it. By the way, I just made a trip to CompuUSA, they are selling CPQ with 350 MHZ/4.2G/32 RAM/56 k box for $599! If I pay $399 for a PC and you ask me to pay $480/year for internet connection, I should think hard before making commitment. If I am paying $40 for cable now, am I going to pay $40 more for internet connection? I should think hard before I commit it. I believe AOL's strategy is quite correct, aim the mass audience, aim the middle and lower income family for eyeballs, provide high-end connection to satisfy the upper income families, with a powerful market share, AOL can bargain a lower access fee from DSL/CABLE/WIRELESS operators and resell the usage to their members and in turn increase AOL's bottom line. Most middle and lower income families tend to glue on the screens long time because they don't have extra money for other recreation hobbies, but as they spend more time on screens, AOL can claim that statistics for more ad $ and/or sell something to someone when he or she got curious enough... At the distant future, AOL will become a utility company, all the pies have been distributed, ISP/portals can only do more services, at that time maybe AOL should go buy telephone companies, wireless companies TV stations, etc., but I believe I will be moving on way before that day arrives. duration