Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: golden_tee who wrote (446)	3/27/1999 9:20:00 PM
From: Michael	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

<< Are you saying that LiPoly batteries have "little commercial value"? I certainly hope that that is not your point. >> My Friend: Please let's talk reality: I noticed that "Valence had no revenue for either quarter". I am stating that whatever techno trash that management states in it's press releases, pseudo contracts and test results. That no revenues means a bogus product, not much different than ALTIF's jig. The jig does exist, it is just not commercially viable. Sure is a nice day biz.yahoo.com <<Valence Technology Announces Third Quarter Results HENDERSON, Nev., Feb. 12 /PRNewswire/ -- Valence Technology, Inc. (Nasdaq: VLNC - news), a research and development company developing advanced, rechargeable, lithium polymer battery technology for commercialization, today reported operating results for its third quarter ended December 27, 1998. Valence reported a net loss available to common stockholders of $11.5 million, or ($0.44) per share, for the third quarter of fiscal 1999. This compares with a net loss available to common stockholders of $5.0 million, or ($0.21) per share, for the same quarter of last fiscal year. Valence had no revenue for either quarter.>>