To: Sam Biller who wrote (4045 ) 3/28/1999 1:40:00 PM From: Brooks Jackson Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 20297
Sam: Now we know who the REAL pea-brained nitwit is. My only excuse is that I grew up in a state bordering on Michigan. It is clear from CKFR's 10K that CKFR is on the hook for customers' bounced checks when the payments are made electronically, but not when they are made by paper check on the customer's account. So the advantages of electronic payment involve a trade-off: what they save on postage and printing they risk losing, in part, through bad checks. It's right there in CKFR's 10K: The Company uses the ACH to execute certain of its customers' payment instructions. Like other users of the ACH, the Company bears credit risk resulting from returned transactions caused by insufficient funds, stop payment orders, closed accounts, frozen accounts, unauthorized use, disputes, theft or fraud. ... The Company bears no credit risk with paper drafts written on a customer's checking account returned for insufficient funds, stop payment orders, closed accounts or frozen accounts. ... Risk Mitigation. The Company's patented bill payment processing system determines the preferred method of payment to balance processing costs, operational efficiencies, and risk of loss. The Company manages its risks associated with its use of the various payment clearance systems through its risk management systems, internal controls, and system security. The Company also maintains a reserve for such risks, which reserve was $1.9 million as of June -16-<PAGE> 17 30, 1998, and the Company has not incurred losses in excess of 0.76% of its revenues in any of the past five years. So your poster knew what he was talking about -- and I didn't know as much as I thought I did about CKFR's behind-the-scenes operations.