SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greenspirit who wrote (40304)3/28/1999 1:21:00 PM
From: pz  Respond to of 67261
 
Bubba did a great job thinking all this through all right....geez.

Attack on Moscow Embassy Foiled

By Angela Charlton
Associated Press Writer
Sunday, March 28, 1999; 12:44 p.m. EST

MOSCOW (AP) -- Gunmen with grenade launchers and an
assault rifle opened fire on the U.S. Embassy in Moscow on
Sunday, in an attack apparently linked to opposition to NATO
airstrikes on Yugoslavia.

Police firing pistols drove the attackers away from the embassy,
which was hit by several bullets but suffered minimal damage. No
one was hurt.

Protesters in other capitals around the world demonstrated
Sunday against the ongoing NATO operation, directing most of
their anger at the United States.

No one claimed responsibility for the Moscow attack. Russia
fiercely opposes the NATO bombings, and rallies have been
held at the U.S. Embassy since Thursday.

Russian news agencies cited police sources as saying three
people had been arrested in the attack, but police officials would
not confirm any arrests.

A white jeep pulled up in front of the embassy and two of the
occupants aimed grenade launchers at the building, as shown in
footage aired on Russia's NTV television network.

One gunman in a ski mask and camouflage fatigues, who had
climbed out of the jeep to aim a rocket launcher, jumped back in
the vehicle when police opened fire. One attacker then opened
fire from inside the jeep with a semi-automatic rifle, sending
police and bystanders diving for cover.

The two rocket launchers were left on the road as the jeep sped
away from the 10-story, mustard-colored building on a major
Moscow street. The vehicle was later found abandoned nearby.

An embassy spokesman, who spoke on condition of anonymity,
said no one in the embassy had been injured and that security
was being tightened. Non-essential embassy personnel had
been told not to come to the embassy over the weekend
because of the protests.

The government condemned Sunday's attack. President Boris
Yeltsin's spokesman Dmitry Yakushkin said the shooting ''throws
a shadow on Russia, which is now making titanic efforts to
mediate the crisis in Yugoslavia.''

Scores of police and troops with automatic weapons ringed the
embassy after the attack. A few hundred protesters also
remained.

In September 1995, a masked attacker fired a rocket-propelled
grenade at the embassy that exploded in an empty office. No
one was injured and there was no claim of responsibility, but the
attack came a day after the Kremlin accused NATO of genocide
against the Bosnian Serbs.

Bombings, shootings and gangland killings have become
commonplace in Moscow, and weapons are readily available.

In other protests Sunday:

-- In Sydney, Australia, about 7,000 protesters attacked the U.S.
consulate. Some hurled broken pieces of concrete through
windows of a shop and restaurant in the building where the U.S.
diplomatic facility is located, and many compared President
Clinton to Adolf Hitler.

One protester scaled two floors of the building and ripped down
a U.S. flag, which was later burned by youths standing atop a bus
shelter. Demonstrations also occurred in Melbourne and
Canberra.

-- In Salzburg, Austria, about 3,500 people carried banners
denouncing the NATO air strikes, waved Yugoslav flags and
declared their support for Yugoslav President Slobodan
Milosevic, the Austria Press Agency reported.

-- French riot police used tear gas to disperse about 300 Serb
supporters who threw rocks and toppled security barriers in
demonstration in front the U.S. Embassy in Paris.



To: greenspirit who wrote (40304)3/28/1999 1:42:00 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 67261
 
Michael:I have not had time to read everything in these sites, but I wanted to respond anyway. I don't think that these things are under attack, for the most part, but I am not sure. I hope not. I don't think that an attempt to regulate content of anything that could otherwise be legitimately published would stand up in court, though. The biggest danger would be one where their carriers were made liable for content, and I don't think that will fly. It is reasonable that Drudge can be sued, but not that his ISP can be. If such a thing occurred, it would frighten off providers. However, they do not "publish", they merely rent space, as at a public meeting...



To: greenspirit who wrote (40304)3/28/1999 9:03:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Glad to see the always reputable Drudge high on the list. But where's the Washington Times? I'm sure JBL could dig up some good Murdoch rags from around the word to add.