SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: biostruggle who wrote (25513)3/29/1999 3:41:00 PM
From: Sawtooth  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
<<Chineese premier pushing CDMA, seen as windfall for Erricson.>>

How so, Marvin? Ericsson's stock price has changed little since the Qcom - Ericy agreement; Qcom's has skyrocketed. ...Tim



To: biostruggle who wrote (25513)3/29/1999 5:09:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
Att Will Come Around, "When?">

AT&T goes its own way for wireless
By John Borland
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
March 29, 1999, 12:40 p.m. PT

Last week's wireless industry truce quelled much of the war over next-generation
mobile phone technology, but a few of the biggest companies in the United States
still remain in the trenches.

AT&T, along with BellSouth and SBC Communications, use a different wireless technology
than most of the rest of the world. That technology still competes with standards supported
by Ericsson and Qualcomm announced last week.

Ma Bell today reiterated its commitment to its own mobile phone technology, called
TDMA, following news of a $1 billion contract with Lucent for equipment to upgrade its
wireless network.

Despite their reach within the United States, these companies' choice of technology has
put them at the margins of an industry-wide effort to reach global standards for
next-generation wireless phones. This new technology, which will likely begin rolling out in
limited areas by the end of next year, will support high-speed Internet downloads and new
voice services over mobile phone networks.

Do you want to know more?
Read related news
View story in The Big Picture
Go to Message Boards
Search News.com



Most in the industry concede that the distinction between technologies doesn't matter to
consumers, who simply want their phones to work when they are turned on. But the split
matters a great deal, however, to carriers and manufacturers who will see lower prices for
equipment if all components are compatible worldwide. These price savings can then be
passed on to consumers.

It's the economics of such a decision that many in the
industry say will ultimately push AT&T and other TDMA
operators to modify their own technology to work with the
Ericsson-Qualcomm CDMA wireless group.

"It doesn't matter much to consumers," said Elliot Hamilton,
director of U.S. telecommunications consulting for the
Strategis Group. "But for the manufacturers, the worst thing
that can happen is uncertainty."

A wireless family
Last week's agreement between Qualcomm and Ericsson
helped quiet what had been a bitter battle between two
different next-generation wireless phone technologies--each a
different form of the so-called CDMA standard.

As part of the new deal, the companies will support a single
"family" of standards to allow a single phone to switch
somewhat seamlessly between each technology. This
means that operators can install networks supporting either
standard, and consumers could roam between networks
supporting the different technologies.

Companies behind the wireless agreement had hoped to
eventually fold companies like AT&T into their new coalition, however.

Although development groups backing AT&T's wireless standard still pursue their own
incompatible third-generation wireless technology, the Qualcomm-Ericsson deal may be
able to support an upgraded version of TDMA.

Analysts say companies such as AT&T are likely to take advantage of this option, rather
than continuing to pursue a wireless strategy parallel to Qualcomm-Ericsson efforts. The
company is already working on making their existing services compatible with other
widespread wireless technologies, analysts said.

"It might be slightly more expensive for the TDMA operators," said Weston Hendrick, a
wireless analyst with the Giga Information Group. "But in the long run the premium will be
worth it. There's really no other choice."