SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: iandiareii who wrote (40565)3/29/1999 4:15:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Nothing that Daniel posts on this thread is intended to be "fun" or "hilarious". His stated purpose is to annoy and disrupt as he goes about defending the indefensible behavior of this alleged man who currently occupies the WH. The "name dropping" charge (by Daniel) is inapposite and not meant in any humorous sense. Finally, I really don't see how the posts you mentioned constitute "name dropping" unless you feel that Neocon is "full of it", a condition I would more readily assume in Danny boy's case. In any event, thanks for the good natured clarification even if it is still somewhat lost on me. Have a good one. JLA



To: iandiareii who wrote (40565)3/29/1999 4:25:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
ian--- You are right, if foible it is, but the reference to Arianna was part of a larger point about drawing unwarranted conclusions from casual acquaintance. The second was the result of Daniel badgering me about whether or not I had met Will. Since I wasn't talking to Daniel at the time, I answered through a third party, to shut him up...


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News