Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : NP Energy Cp New -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DR. MEADE who wrote (15492)	3/29/1999 6:43:00 PM
From: David L Kosakowski	Respond to of 22810

DR.MEADE, T-2 trading days left in March and no release and no $3.00 per share either. Ready to give up? There will be no NR this week either and maybe not NEXT WEEK if MDIN and hole 6 results aren't revealed by then. Do you really think Dave would have taken vacation if there was to be a NR this week? I don't. The peak for this stock may have been in it's usual March time frame as history does repeat itself

To: DR. MEADE who wrote (15492)	3/29/1999 7:39:00 PM
From: Alan Whirlwind	Respond to of 22810

LOL--I missed a zero somewhere in there. Hopefully it was a prophetic faux pas.

To: DR. MEADE who wrote (15492)	3/30/1999 1:43:00 PM
From: J. Nelson	Respond to of 22810

Looks like A.W. was smart if he waited. What's your take on this dumping of the price? Have any clue? News on the way must be, yet you told eveyone they would be fools to not buy yesterday. What about today? more fools????

To: DR. MEADE who wrote (15492)	3/30/1999 1:52:00 PM
From: Rhino	Respond to of 22810

OK. This has now become obnoxious enough (Dr. Meade's incessant Rah-rah-rahing) to annoy me. Dr. Meade: Your irrational exuberance is too much. (Definition of rational, according to Webster's: "Relating to, based on, or agreeable to reason" ["Reason": A sufficient ground of explanation or of logical defense, especially something (as a principle or law) that supports a conclusion or explains a fact]. You have no tangible evidence for your claims. I'm not even talking about David's "$3.00 by March" reminders. I don't care if you were off in this projection. What bothers me is 1) how far you were off and, more importantly, 2) the reasons you were off. You keep citing sure things (BIG news releases) that don't materialize. This is irresponsible at best, and criminal at worst (Depending on your motives and remuneration for doing so). I'd like to think that you've simply been foolish on this one, but your insistent hyping of this stock (in the face of all reason) is mind-boggling (At least, it is to my little mind). It has also started to become aggravating. Wait until the stock scrapes above $0.04 before you even think about calling it a "Must buy!" And even then, I would be careful. Your credibility is in the toilet right now. I think I believed you at one point in the distant past. I will not make that mistake again. Belief is an expectation for the future that is founded in the past. Your past leaves me no reason to even bother reading your posts anymore. You're free to post, of course. I just ask you to be more thoughtful and more careful about what you post. Rhino