SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tim Luke who wrote (21078)3/29/1999 6:46:00 PM
From: MrThesp  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90042
 
I thought it was a little weird that FORE didn't behave better...

after reading that release this morning. But it wasn't the news that people were looking for. It does, however, make FORE that much more attractive as a target. I wouldn't be surprised if FORE showed more weakness tomorrow. I won't be happy but I won't be surprised. ;-)

At this point, particularly after the Australian article and FORE not denying anything, it really looks like a sure thing. If that article had been a bit less obscure I suspect the stock would have broken 20 by now. Maybe we should SPAM the entire Yahoo board?<ggg>

Just between us chickens I suspect FORE should go for high 20's or better. Too much history showing that they wouldn't settle for less. 32-35 wouldn't even shock me. My bet? 29-33 per.



To: Tim Luke who wrote (21078)3/29/1999 6:48:00 PM
From: steve susko  Respond to of 90042
 
gte could be a suitor.




To: Tim Luke who wrote (21078)3/29/1999 6:58:00 PM
From: Junkyardawg  Respond to of 90042
 
The reason Fore was down today was
because of you.
It was all your fault.
heheheheheheheh
:-)dawgy dawg



To: Tim Luke who wrote (21078)3/29/1999 7:25:00 PM
From: backman  Respond to of 90042
 
let's see....if fore is in play, and they were bought by victoria's secret, would everyone want some "FOREPLAY" ?
david
PS: oh, yes, bring on the manipulation