SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: O. H. Rundell who wrote (5137)3/30/1999 1:06:00 AM
From: Christine Traut  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
O.H. Rundell:

Bravo! Yes. Why can't Bill Gates solve this if it is so darn simple. And why does Microsoft have to say that they are Y2K compliant when they are scrambling to patch virtually everything?

Enquiring minds want to know.

Christine



To: O. H. Rundell who wrote (5137)3/30/1999 1:32:00 AM
From: issme  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
In all reality the answer to your question is, They are not concerned over it. By the time Y2K is here it will be 9 months down the road, and it will be time to replace it with something that is not Obsolete, and the software used to operate the system will be replaced by faster, more efficient software, that will surely be Y2K compatible!! Why bother fixing it, when a planned replacement will be added??? Cost efficiency!!!

Truthfully, you will have more problems with your T.V calendar, or your VCR calendar, than the largest bank in the world will have with their OS, come the turn of the century...

>>>ISSME<<<



To: O. H. Rundell who wrote (5137)3/30/1999 1:53:00 AM
From: issme  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
Here is an excellent link to possible Y2K problems, fixes, and frequently asked questions, I would be much more inclined to believe what is said here, than some site created on Geocities, by some one that cries, "The sky is falling", much more reputable.
microsoft.com

>>>ISSME<<<



To: O. H. Rundell who wrote (5137)3/30/1999 7:44:00 AM
From: Jeff Redman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
"Question from a non-programmer: If it's all so simple, why isn't MS NT server Y2K compliant yet? Maybe Service Pack 5?"

We tested NT with service pack 4 in the year 2000 and had no problems, our CAD network runs off of NT, the only thing we use it for at this time.