SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Annette who wrote (8464)3/30/1999 11:41:00 AM
From: mrnaive  Respond to of 41369
 
I think that would be a worse split. However, no split would be worse. AOL keeps getting better and better, but this post keeps getting worse and worser.
Hey!! by the way! where is that fella that was shorting AOL awhile back, because Prodigy was going to take away AOL's market share.
He really sounded like he knew what he was talking about!
lolol



To: Annette who wrote (8464)3/30/1999 11:44:00 AM
From: PatiBob  Respond to of 41369
 
Isn't a 3-2 split worse than a 2-1?

Please forgive a stupid question but why would a 3-2 split be worse than a 2-1 split.

I'm just so happy that I have at least one stock that doesn't do a reverse split.

PB



To: Annette who wrote (8464)3/30/1999 12:16:00 PM
From: robert duke  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 41369
 
Yes a 3-2 is not what we want. We will most likely get a 2-1 or a 3-1. I could see a 3-1 which will slow down the growth a little. Of the price I mean. I would put the price back to the 50 range.