Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mineman who wrote (2603)	3/30/1999 1:04:00 PM
From: Eric Moriarty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

I can see how you arrive at your conclusions and it is obvious that they are determined by your short position and not the geology. Go home!

To: mineman who wrote (2603)	3/30/1999 1:04:00 PM
From: Gary Nash	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

Mineman: Pre-mature and loose conclusions as usual. If you loosely interpret today's results, you might convince some people you are right. BUT, to say the body is cut off to the east and they will only find mineralization to the west is wrong. They are now drilling at 10 and 10+50 which is east of hole 99-01 and the down hole looks promising. There is a fault east of 99-01 which cut off the "good stuff", but that does not mean there is nothing east of that! In fact, the magnetic anomaly extends for 1 kilometer north east! Chances are good more "pockets" will be found. Again, much too early to be writing off the play with blatant empty statements.

To: mineman who wrote (2603)	3/30/1999 1:06:00 PM
From: inlong	Respond to of 5821

Mineman, I'm not a geologist, but I think Nuinsco would cancel drilling if what you are saying were true. Since drilling continues, I would suspect Nuinsco's geologists disagree with you.