SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RTev who wrote (19289)3/30/1999 2:12:00 PM
From: ericneu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
> What am I missing? Why wouldn't USWest match the MSN DSL service performance at a lower cost.

> Yeah. That's the big question. If msn or aol or anyone else came in with much lower prices, I can only hope that USWest and GTE (which has much of the suburban territory in this region) would have to lower their prices.

A couple of possibilities come to mind:

1) The telco is using this as a testbed for new technology.

2) Due to the MSN co-branding, they picture this as less competition to traditional business service such as T-1s. In some situations, DSL is considerably cheaper for equal or superior bandwidth. Good for the consumer, not necessarily good for the telco.

3) I'm aware of at least one company providing xDSL service over lines where the telco said they couldn't (using different technology than the telco and providing extra equipment). This could be something along that line.

- Eric



To: RTev who wrote (19289)3/30/1999 2:32:00 PM
From: Teflon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
RTev,

Are you sure WorldCom's UUNet is a CLEC? I am not so sure. They are not an RBOC in the traditional sense. Aren't they more of a Long Distance carrier much like AT&T?

If this is the case, is there a possibility that AT&T could provide the same service for MSFT that UUNet is providing??

Teflon