Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (2625)	3/30/1999 2:14:00 PM
From: mineman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

Eric, the zone appears to be cut-off on 3 sides by the results to date, but that does not mean the high-grade bed could be narrow and weave between the holes drilled and reported so far. But if that is the case then the narrow width would restrict the size to below economic. The easterly trend of the mineralization does not mean the higher grade zones go down to the base of the gabbro, but they are likely "floating" within the gabbro-norite along structurally-prepared layers. Actually management should be reporting over the visually massive pyrrhotite-pentlandite 2.5 m thick zone, the heavily disseminated 5 m thick zone above this, and the above 30 m disseminated zone. Perhaps someone should mention to them to put this out in their next release. 7.5 m thickness including the 2.5 m high-grade zone would be safe minimum-dilution room-and-pillar mining thickness.