SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeff Vayda who wrote (25585)3/30/1999 2:46:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
Chip Rate Still An Issue>

Qualcomm, Ericsson leave others to decide
chip rate

By Lynnette Luna

Although Qualcomm Inc. and L.M. Ericsson announced resolutions to
Code Division Multiple Access disputes and the standoff over
third-generation intellectual property rights, the companies didn't resolve
key technical differences 3G parties have tried to resolve for more than a
year.

Qualcomm and Ericsson announced last week they resolved all patent
disputes over cdmaOne technology and will cross license IPRs for all
CDMA technologies, including cdmaOne, W-CDMA and cdma2000.
Both companies had remained deadlocked over 3G patents, refusing to
cross license patents they claimed to own to W-CDMA and cdma2000
technologies unless certain conditions were met. Qualcomm wanted one
CDMA standard backward compatible to second-generation systems,
while Ericsson advocated multiple standards.

The two said they now agree to jointly support approval by the
International Telecommunication Union and other standards
bodies—including the U.S. Telecommunications Industry Association and
the European Telecommunications Standards Institute, which already has
approved W-CDMA technology—of a single CDMA 3G standard that
encompasses three optional modes: direct sequence FDD, multi-carrier
FDD and TDD. Each mode supports operation with both GSM MAP and
ANSI-41 networks. The companies say the resolution allows operators to
select which mode of operation to deploy based on market needs.
Greenfield operators in Europe are likely to deploy a direct sequence
mode, while existing operators in the United States will deploy the
multicarrier approach.

The companies agreed to this framework last month at the TransAtlantic
Business Dialogue meeting in Washington, D.C.

The ITU adopted a similar framework earlier this month in Brazil, and last
week announced a single flexible standard with a choice of multiple access
methods that include CDMA, TDMA and TD/CDMA technologies to
meet the many different mobile operational environments around the
world.

Qualcomm and Ericsson did not come to terms on the hotly contested
issues of chip rate, synchronization and pilot schemes. Ericsson has pushed
W-CDMA technology—a standard incompatible with cdma2000
technology's 3.684 Mcps rate. Qualcomm remained adamant on the 3.68
Megachips per second rate to maintain backward compatibility to today's
cdmaOne networks. Both companies last week were quiet on the issue
and said they are leaving further harmonization efforts to carriers.

‘‘Operators are looking to see advantages to further convergence,'' said
Dr. Irwin Jacobs, chairman and chief executive officer of Qualcomm.
‘‘The agreement removes the issue of IPR blockages from those
discussions. Operators will make decisions on how to best proceed
ahead.''

A global carrier meeting in London last week did not produce a document
stating any agreement on technical parameters. The ITU was hoping for
input from carriers to help harmonize the CDMA umbrella standard
further.

‘‘The parties are still talking and moving forward in the correct direction,''
said Keith Paglusch, senior vice president of operations with Sprint PCS,
a nationwide cdmaOne operator pushing for one CDMA standard.
‘‘There's a series of discussions that continue to take place.''

Perry LaForge, executive director of the CDMA Development Group,
hinted that consensus is building on some technical parameters such as
synchronization.

‘‘The chip rate was used as a tool against cdmaOne. Now that Ericsson is
on board, it's not as big a deal,'' said LaForge.

But the North American GSM Alliance, in heralding the companies'
announcement, said it will continue to ensure that technical parameters
enable multiple technologies. The ITU said several countries, particularly
from Asia and Australia, urged members to agree on a single 3G standard,
ideally based on one technology. Though the view was endorsed by many
operators, several stressed the need for operational flexibility to meet
varying situations around the world, said the ITU.

‘‘The flexible approach represented the only option on which consensus
could be achieved and work could proceed,'' said the ITU. ‘‘The meeting
nonetheless agreed to strongly encourage the various operators fora in
their efforts to achieve a minimum set of radio interfaces, covering
operators needs having the least possible impact on mobile terminals so
that the user is unaware of the technology which provides the services
he/she has chosen, and thus meet the widely endorsed IMT-2000
objectives.''

In migrating to W-CDMA technology, GSM carriers will have significant
investments to make in changing out equipment, while existing cdmaOne
operators will be able to gradually migrate to cdma2000 by adding extra
equipment. Moving the chip rate away from 3.68 Mcps would mean all
carriers must start over.

The next challenge, said the ITU, will be developing a more detailed ITU
specification in a way that minimizes technical complexity while catering to
multiple operating environments.

‘‘We're likely to see handsets glue the family of standards together if the
chip rate is close enough,'' said Bob Egan, research director with Gartner
Group in Stamford, Conn.

The ITU will hold meetings starting in late May in Beijing. The consensus
process should end by then, and members will begin with the technical
work on the standards, which will require explanations of how each
standard operates.



To: Jeff Vayda who wrote (25585)3/30/1999 9:22:00 PM
From: Brian  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 


Whisper number at 65 (vs 57 consensus)

Wasn't .69 posted last quarter? Why wouldn't there be a quarter to quarter improvement as has been the history for this company? Irwin has said publicly that sales are going well this quarter. Also, the drag of infrastructure will be reduced due to the workforce reduction.

Why are these estimates so low?