To: Drake who wrote (19298 ) 3/30/1999 3:53:00 PM From: Punko Respond to of 74651
Re: Msft ability to eat AOL's lunch...wouldn't that depend on Msft's keeping their cash cow -- i.e. no break up? A broken up internet baby bill minus the monopoly os biz and the mountains of cash is just another online company. Until the settlement with Uncle Sam and his nephews is finalized, it would be premature to write AOL and others off. I personally would not throw any new non-speculative money into msft because of this great uncertainty. The possibility that the OS business will be split off into a separate independent entity may be unlikely, but then again, Uconn beat Duke. Some people say this wouldn't be a bad thing (i.e. the sum of the pieces would be greater than the whole). I can't see how. I'm in Microsoft for three reasons. 1. The well-protected monopoly os cash cow, with its ample, reliable, predictable spigot of cash quarter after quarter 2. The mountains of cash in the bank 3. The flexibility that 1 and 2 provide to take over new businesses, create new cash cows, put even more green stuff in the bank This uniquely positions Microsoft to continue to grow at least 30%+ annually as far as I can see. I just don't think 3 is possible without 1 and 2. Sure they might grow, but I don't think that growth would be nearly as predictable or as fast as it otherwise would be with the advantages that 1 and 2 give them. And it's the predictability that scores with me (and i would suspect with many others who unlike me, control the big bucks). With 1 and 2, AOL is dead meat long term. That's a no-brainer. So is Oracle, CA, SAP, just about any other software company whose business Microsoft wants. And let's not stop there. How about on-line financial services, big and small ticket item sales, telecom and broadcasting, etc. etc. The sky's the limit. That's what makes Microsoft such a great investment. But without 1 and 2, it's just another Amazon, On-sale, Yahoo, or AOL. These are a dime a dozen. Right or wrong, Uncle Sam is taking issue with 3, blaming and threatening 1, and looking to do who knows what with 2.