Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: matt who wrote (2640)	3/30/1999 3:31:00 PM
From: Gary Nash	Respond to of 5821

Matt: It is pointless trying to deal with Mineman's inconsistencies. He seems to make good sense at times, then the loose ends show up and blow his knowledge to bits. Must be a short, or something worse.

To: matt who wrote (2640)	3/30/1999 3:45:00 PM
From: mineman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

Matt, tell that to my boss, I never had one thing to eat until 2:30!! Life on the chain-gang! Yes you could use 2% Nickel but to justify the pre-production stripping cost you are going to need at least 3 million tons and the results to date do not indicate anything like this exists. .5 million tons at 2% Ni does not cut it! PGE would most like all go to the concentrate to be recovered at Sudbury. The 5 grams Ag is not worth considering. The cut off for the high grade versus 2% material should be considered, however, and I will perhaps include that variable into future calculations!