SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Internet Analysis - Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (268)3/30/1999 4:34:00 PM
From: edamo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 419
 
chuzz..re jubak...

i admire a man who has courage of conviction?....how does one move jubak off the fence....ultra conservative....

why is dell perceived as "no value"...and yet internets "value"...in the real world i would rather be mike dell than ben and jerry @ yahooooooo....

i'm confused!

ed a.



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (268)3/30/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: Steve Robinett  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 419
 
CTC,
Jubak values AOL by comparing it to similar companies, just as people value real estate or cars by using comparable properties (as opposed to valuing it by comparing multiples to growth or cash flow to interest rates). Once you accept that the comparison is valid, the rest of the "valuation" makes sense, indeed, is simply arithmetic. The obvious problem with his approach is the value of the assets to which he compares AOL, also inflated by Internet mania. If the entire sector is inflated by speculation, comparisons produce self-justifying circular arguments, e.g., Yahoo is selling for X so AOL must be worth some fraction or multiple of X, no matter that both are overvalued by traditional methods, which are of course wrong , because it's different this time, and the world of the Internet it the world of the future, not the stuffy old past, and whatever other pieces of intellectual rubbish people throw around to justify lottery fever.
Best,
--Steve