Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mineman who wrote (2672)	3/30/1999 8:13:00 PM
From: inlong	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

Can anyone explain why hole 7 was a dud when it is between 4 & 1 which had high grade??

To: mineman who wrote (2672)	3/30/1999 8:39:00 PM
From: Tom Cat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

mineman Holes 5,6,7 and 9 are far from telling me that they are closing the structure, but just leading to where the feeder may be (south), the grades and intercepts are NOT bad at all, these are vertical holes, if they had drilled on an angle, intercepts would be larger of course. I am amazed how far your mind can go on your desire to discredit this early exploration results, there are 10 more holes being assayed, and ALL intercepted sulfides.....I find that very positive, as far as the downhole EM your guess is as good as any, but if the NWI geos are excited about that, so am I.....I am always open to different points of view, but looking at all your posts, you either have a paranoia problem with NWI or are the biggest short ever yet. No harm in being short, just say it so we can be on the same level. TC