Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microphonics Inc. (mrps) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sprintcar who wrote (4682)	3/30/1999 9:13:00 PM
From: J Walter Jacobs	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8189

My point earlier was that many seem to be missing the big picture. You've just summarized it. Now taking those figures we have a price to annual sales per share ratio of .36. Grocery stores have a price to sales ratio of 1! Growing companies typically command a ratio of 3 or 4 to 1. By this standard MRPS is grossly undervalued. Look at the price to sales of most of the internet stock.

To: Sprintcar who wrote (4682)	3/31/1999 5:50:00 AM
From: r g potgieser	Respond to of 8189

yeah! so we can relax no matter how low the stock falls because in the end we will be rewarded. Either that or a fraud. I am still confident, but hope for more facts. As someone stated, if these figures are correct we may go to 120$ RG

To: Sprintcar who wrote (4682)	3/31/1999 9:22:00 AM
From: Joe-MA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8189

Sprint, I think your figures re revenues are overstated. I have annotated your figures below: >>> lets see what we have here, please correct me where ever you feel I am incorrect. Based on Press Releases.. >>> 1/14/99 Ford Deal 6553 facilities x1 per facility(est.)x$2,000 est cost= 13,106,000 ( I believe these are the smaller units sold for no more than $450. each. Also, this is a year contract I believe so no more than 50-60% in 1999) >>> 2/3/99 GM Deal 64 plants x 20 units per x $2,000 est cost = 3,200,000 (They have only sold to the Pontiac plant - 20 i think on an order of 40 - they have demoed at Dayton - and will do so at others - but I think you're off here by at least 50% or more for 1999) >>>2/10/99 F & M 1000 units x $2,000 = 2,000,000 (Thisis a distributor through 5 states which has an order for 75 units per month - no more than 500 for 1999 at a cost i am guessing less than $2,000) >> 2/23/99 SPX Lowener 9700 units x $450 = 4,365,000 (Same as Ford above - do not know number sold for 1999 - would cut this in half as well though) 3/2/99 NASCAR R & D 0 ( I was told NASCAR was a "paying" customer - meaning they are buying some. Don't know volume) 3/9/99 ARCA R & D 0 (ditto above) 3/11/99 Army Corps ? Total Estimates At Present $ 22,671,000 ( Doing a real quick correction I speculate less than 10 mill from above in 1999 - BUT, even at 8 mill in current contracts, not counting anything for the rest of the year and chopping off 50% for overhead to boot, along with 40% tax - we get $2mill minimum which is .20 cents per share which at a 15PE ======= $3.00 per share value. A ridiculously low conservative guesstimate, admittedly, which I think shows why we are all here. Now if we could get the company to give us a real summary of real revenue from existing real contracts, we could do this for real. Joe-MA