Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Enigma who wrote (2698)	3/31/1999 12:18:00 AM
From: Brumell	Respond to of 5821

I don't know and don't think anyone could say at this point. In hole 99-07 the lower grade 1.05% ni was at a shallow vertical depth from 20.45 to 31.75 meters. Hole 99-06 with the higher grade section started at 96.65 meters vertical depth to 143.72 meters with the 11%high grade section occurring at the bottom from 141.15 to 1.43.72 meters. I get the feeling we have lots of smoke but no real fire. What's there seems very erratic but we have a long way to go. There seems to be a lot of nickel but the job is finding the right concentration. Wish I knew more, DoubleD. Regards, Bob

To: Enigma who wrote (2698)	3/31/1999 2:43:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5821

You know in looking at it closely we can see that this thing is very complex. They are not drilling in the mag zone or the IP zone. This is probably vertically faulted on the west and horizontally faulted too. The zone dips fiercely to the south west about 60 degrees too in places it seems. It is not flat as can be seen by the really big difference between hole 6 at 165 metres west and hole 7 at 115 metres west on section 11 north. You come up dip on the east side of the basin 120 metres vertically in 50 metres laterally. That is 67 degree of dip to the basin edge. Or it is faulted on the east too. This is going to take some head banging to figure it out. It is not cut off as mineman says. It is quite mixed up. Not simple at all. This is good not bad. Of course it will require some interpretation. EC<:-}