Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mineman who wrote (2706)	3/31/1999 10:50:00 AM
From: Just G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

Mineman: Thought you didn't have time to post, I was hoping!!!

To: mineman who wrote (2706)	3/31/1999 11:07:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 5821

No matter how you interpret it non sequiturs always apply. I think you must find it and then figure out how it got there. Granite dykes are very common in a lot of orebodies. Well not ubiquitous but they are in Sudbury and Thompson. When you are talking nickel it is amazing how much they emphasize the mafic and ignore the everpresent felsic. But when you are in copper zinc the monolithic komatiites and gabbors and seprpentines are considered passe. But they are there and in gold too. Every volcanic sequence varies from mafic to felsic over its history. They say the more dykes the more ore. If you are arguing sulphide melts injection then the presence of dykes argues a rich dilation system for those feeders. EC<:-}