Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microvision (MVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dwight martin who wrote (2215)	3/31/1999 1:24:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

Dwight, I do not want to belabor the issue, nor to impune Tegreene's credential (his name, as far as I remember was not on these two patents), but all the lawyers had to do (with the "weak" problem (scanning), was to use the term a beam of photons and it is the beam not the photons that "scans" the retina, it would still be weak, but not inoperative, the second part of my comment . that is what makes the whole claim inoperative, and thus, possibly, the patent invalid. Zeev