SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RDM who wrote (53751)3/31/1999 1:32:00 PM
From: Yougang Xiao  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572505
 
CPQ Presario desktop line revamp offer further indication that
speed path problem is gone, hopefully for good!

Go to compaq.com

See the K6-2lization of Presario desktop line, which is revamped recently.

Excluding the "Configure By Yourself" lines that have both Intel and AMD chips, the score for regular desktop are overwhelmingly K6-2 based.

Cyrix --- 1 model -- 2200 Line
K6-2 --- 1 model -- 5070 Line
K6-2 --- 3 models -- 5100 Line
K6-2 --- 11 models - 5200 Line
Celeron - 1 model --- 5200 Line
Pentiumx - 5 models - 5600 Line

Total:

Cyrix 1
AMD 15
Intel 6

Interestingly, Presario desktop only offer one Celeron based model.

The last thing Intel wants to see is that majority of celerons are going into cheap business boxes, rather than the intended home pc market.

Compaq, you are bad!



To: RDM who wrote (53751)3/31/1999 1:34:00 PM
From: Yougang Xiao  Respond to of 1572505
 
RDM, thanks. EOM



To: RDM who wrote (53751)3/31/1999 1:43:00 PM
From: d e conway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572505
 
<< Everyone has speed paths that are weak >>

Ahhhhhhaaaaaa...maybe that's what's wrong with pRENGLE and Make-It-No.

regards, Dan



To: RDM who wrote (53751)3/31/1999 2:05:00 PM
From: Yousef  Respond to of 1572505
 
RDM,

Re: "It is not unlikely that AMD will have further "speed path
problem" ... They become a problem when the parameters affecting
them fluctuate ..."

As you say, RDM ... Process control of "critical parameters" is vital
to insuring that bin yields stay predictable and at target yield. This
is just one of the ways that Intel is ahead of AMD in process technology.
Intel has better process control while AMD has a long history (233mhz/266mhz
at .35um, 400mhz/450mhz at .25um) of poorer process control. Intel also
has a "significant" lead in higher yields as well. One would think that
AMD would have "learned" from their experience with their .35um
process ... Guess NOT.

Make It So,
Yousef